
La polizia indaga mentre la tipografia di Reform si scusa per la lettera di approvazione del residente che non diceva che proveniva dal partito
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/police-investigation-reforms-printing-firm-33380484
di denyer-no1-fan
10 commenti
Reform like the Tories before them are using scummy election tactics? Who could have seen that coming?
I have the letter (ripped up now) and was a ridiculous ramble on about the nhs, gender toilets and winter fuel lol. So odd and sadly manipulative to old people/ anyone without critical thinking
Another source, this one including the letter itself:
https://manchestermill.co.uk/exclusive-reform-uk-just-broke-electoral-law-in-gorton-denton/
Expect more of this. They are following the Trump playbook.
Patricia Clegg is real it seems, she commented on a Facebook page for Tameside backing Reform change the @ to a in facebook
https://m.f@cebook.com/mancitycouncil/photos/a-uk-parliamentary-by-election-will-be-held-in-the-gorton-and-denton-constituenc/1316978240461799/?set=a.301828928643407
Assume this sort of “mistakes” are priced into the cost of politicking. You never see quick and proper punishment, and it might swing a few votes your way.
> Reform’s printers, Hardings Print Solutions Limited, has apologised to the party and residents of the constituency, saying the artwork including the required imprint had been correctly supplied by the party but it was removed ‘during the final trimming stage’ of production.
Ah, so it was definitely the printer’s fault. Not Reform. Right? Reform definitely included the imprint on the letter, and obviously checked that the letter had the imprint before posting it to people.
Of course, it would still be an offence for the promoter and publishers, not just the printer (or an illegal practice, in the case of the candidate or election agent). Unless they “took all reasonable steps, and exercised all due diligence” to make sure this didn’t happen. Like by checking the letter before the sent it out.
Also I like how the headline calls it a “resident’s endorsement letter” but also notes that “Reform’s printing firm” did the apologising. Why would Reform’s printers apologise for a random resident doing something illegal? Oh wait, in their apology they say the party provided the imprint…
If they will then who ever is second should challenge the election in court.
It’s probably a cock-up rather than intentional, but either way, it’s a clear and obvious breach of electoral law and I can’t see that investigation taking very long before they charge and fine the local Reform party.
Good, automatically forfeit then for breaking the rules right?