Share.

8 commenti

  1. MrBulwark on

    Yeah… We shouldn’t be reducing support for our children when we have a surplus budget. Dumbest shit ever.

  2. donalhunt on

    Not isolated to Kerry. My local primary schools in Cork are also affected. One is seeing a 40% reduction in SNA hours. 😬

    This is at a time when the government is saying Assessment of Needs are not required for supports to be in place. There is a suspicion that the SNA allocations are being based on the number of kids in schools with defined support plans (i.e. already have an assessment). This at a time when the government is saying AON process should not gate supports. 😬

    Will be investigating further in the coming days (as many parents and schools will be). The lack of transparency is fucked up (but not unexpected). Very annoying given many children only discover they need support during primary, secondary or even third-level education. 🤯

  3. Archamasse on

    Insane to propose cutting SNAs at all when they’re already underpaid and overworked for the stuff they do. That kind of support can be the difference between a child retaining speech or not. 

    My partner’s an SNA and she comes home bleeding at least once a week and physically exhausted every day, *current* SNA cover is barely sufficient to get the job done safely as it is, never mind to the standard kids deserve.

  4. Playful-Parsnip-3104 on

    The reality is that the rates of special needs are skyrocketing (nobody seems interested in why) and the government’s policy of integration/inclusivity is an enormous and totally unsustainable burden on mainstream schools. Many schools are now being forced to reproduce a mini-SEN school within their own four walls with so-called “autism classes” because integration is simply unworkable.

    This was not hard to predict. Integration is a dogma which makes policymakers feel good about themselves while completely disregarding the practical realities of school education.

    With fewer SNAs the problem will be doubly acute. Utter stupidity from the get-go.

  5. FluffyDiscipline on

    No doubt linked to the allocation of SET hours assigned to each child, reduced in 2024 from 5 to 3 hours, along with the removal of “complex needs” as a definition.

    A minefield for every school and parent with a special needs in the country.

    So many people think if a child is lucky enough finally get a diagnosis, they will qualify for special needs help, for the time they are in school. Not the case and if a school hasn’t got the students to back up the hours then they risk losing SNA’s. Its a shameful juggling match that hasn’t changed in the last 20 yrs, just got worse.

  6. 5555555555558653 on

    Record corporation tax intake, welfare for developers and multinational corporate landlords.*

  7. StarsofSobek on

    It’s a problem in a lot of places. My kid’s school has been begging to get an additional SNA (they’ve jumped through hoops, met all the criteria, checked every box) and they just got approved for an SNA for *half* days.

    Ridiculous.

    Funding and resources aren’t being given when asked and applied for; there’s a lot of moving goal posts and politics making it difficult for schools to get what they desperately need; and then you have the politicians and representatives saying things like, “there’s been a near double increase in SNAs/funding/resources since 2020.”

    Yeah… 2020 left most resources empty and desperate to recover. Here, in Cavan, we lost our entire Enable team in 2020. All of them. As of October 2025, we finally began to hear back from a whole new set of people.

    Of course percentages double or sound big when your baseline is near zero.

Leave A Reply