Share.

4 commenti

  1. SujalChirme7049 on

    Honestly this feels less like being anti-AI and more like basic risk management. If you don’t fully know where sensitive data is going or how it’s being processed, turning things off until there are clear rules and guarantees is the cautious move — especially for government systems. The real challenge will be finding a balance where privacy and security don’t end up slowing innovation completely.

  2. Jumping-Gazelle on

    >*The chamber emailed its members on Monday to say it had disabled “built-in artificial intelligence features” on corporate tablets after its IT department assessed it couldn’t guarantee the security of the tools’ data.”Some of these features use cloud services to carry out tasks that could be handled locally, sending data off the device,”*

    Good

    >*Apps, email, calendar, documents, and other day-to-day tools are not affected, the email to lawmakers said.*

    ugh. And you just “determined” these tools have “built in AI features”… which tools are disabled? Just pesky time-registration and admin? Sure important, but still.

    Meanwhile, “Dear AI, could you please send this plan to all EU-recipients and mark the next counter-US meeting in the calendar… please.”

  3. In my opinion, AI shouldn’t crawl around government and specially military; so I think this is a good initiative,

Leave A Reply