‘Mia figlia era stata rapita’: Le famiglie hanno impedito di vedere i loro cari disabili

Im going to wonder how many of the people who say PIP is nothing but scroungers and SEND is just i pad babies are gonna show up . My bet none since no one gives a single flying fuck about disabled people unless its pointing at an olympican 

This will be a fun test of people’s bullshit filter.

Even on the face of the article, these are people who have had people removed from their care by court order because of council concerns (which presumably the court considered substantiated).

>**Her adult son has severe learning disabilities and is under the Court of Protection**, which means he does not have the mental capacity to make decisions about his own welfare. It also means we cannot identify him or his mum, whose name we have changed.

>Rita raised her son at home for his entire childhood, with some help from carers. **When he turned 18, the local council decided he would be better off being cared for in supported living with full-time carers, against his mum’s wishes.**

Now, one might think that might raise some red flags that their version of events might be…..less than balanced.

And yet the article asks us to take them at their word that they were ‘just raising valid concerns’. Despite the fact that, again, the article itself tells us that the court of protection has agreed with the restrictions imposed on them:

>The more concerns she raised, the more restrictions were introduced, **approved by the Court of Protection.**

And of course the Court judgements where these decisions were made are all confidential, and the care homes are legally prevented from commenting on the cases. So we get this, an entirely one sided article almost entirely based on the version of events from an unreliable narrator………

In my experience the court of protection judges are professional and take their jobs very seriously. That alone should give people pause for thought that there might be a bit more going on here than is presented.

This is quite common. The same happens with elderly as well. When you have DOLS restrictions or similar places upon an individual – it means the care provider is given all the power and the families have little to no say regarless of how well their loved one is being cared for. It is akin to kidnapping !

Families should always be given the priority in care of a child or elderly parent or family member – the state or a random facility should not be given priority. They have no clue about the needs of an individual and are often so stretched that they can’t provide for them properly !