La corte d’appello respinge l’ultima contestazione relativa all’aggiunta dell’IVA alle tasse scolastiche private del Regno Unito | Scuole private
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2026/feb/27/appeal-court-rejects-challenge-vat-uk-private-school-fees
di Only-Emu-9531
11 commenti
They should claim they’re not actually private schools but just a chocolate-coated private school-shaped state school.
So, the first major Brexit policy came into action.
Good. I’m tired of the argument from a lot of these people that “private school was our only option” when it comes to schooling. If the only way to give your child a decent education is to send them to a fee paying school instead of a local one, then unfortunately that is very much a you problem.
Also the line “I work hard/my parents work hard to afford the fees”. Everyone works hard, why should my taxes subsidize your private school fees?
It will raise a negligible amount of money. It will not affect the truly rich anyway. The people.it will affect are the middle classes who already have some of the highest tax burdens because theyre on high PAYE salaries eg doctors, dentists, senior teachers, engineers etc. However these people mostly live in nice areas they’re going to go to a decent school if theyre priced out of private, because theyre in the cachement area.
The real loser is the poor kid who’s mum wants to get him into the oversubscribed good school on the other side of town, because it now has another half dozen children in its patch it has to accommodate.
But it’s popular online and amongst Labour members because “fuck those bastards earning more than me”
If they want their children to go to private school cheap they should have had children clever enough to get in on a scholarship.
Skill issue, frankly.
Mysteriously, in Finland where there are no private schools, the public schools are excellent…
Wherever you stand on this issue, taxing education is _insane_.
I mean the main argument against it is it only hurts doctors and lawyers, who pay a tonne in tax and keep the country afloat.
Whilst allowing the billionaires to keep doing as they do.
But that’s not exactly a legal issue. If the government want to keep attacking successful earners that’s their right.
I don’t agree with the policy (because I think it will ultimately be counterproductive), but it’s clearly within the government’s lawful powers to pass a bill to do this.
I’m sick of governments facing endless legal challenges whenever it does something someone doesn’t like. If you don’t like the government, elect a different one at the next election.
Scrap the lot of them. Invest enough in state education to provide good quality education for all.
Well-off people have cornered the market in chips-on-shoulders.