Close Menu
    Regno Unito

    Shabana Mahmood limiterà i rifugiati a 30 mesi nel Regno Unito

    Share.
    View 6 Comments

    6 commenti

    1. The-Peel on

      Given the US and Israel are now creating an all new migrant crisis in the Middle East that’ll head straight to our doors, I doubt Shabana’s actions will achieve any good.

    3. MonkeManWPG on

      This makes perfect sense with the intention of the asylum scheme. There’s no reason for someone to be in the UK for asylum if it’s safe to return.

    4. JB_UK on

      Very misleading headline, to the point of being clickbait:

      > Under Monday’s changes, adults and accompanied children claiming asylum will receive a 30-month period of protection if it is granted.

      > At a 30-month review refugees with a continuing need of sanctuary will have their protection renewed, while those whose countries are now deemed safe will be expected to return home.

      So this is the same story as we had a few days ago, that asylum will be made temporary if the country subsequently becomes safe. This is just the cadence by which the reviews will happen as to whether the country is safe. If the country isn’t safe they can stay.

      I guess The Guardian’s business model now is whipping up outrage so it’s no surprise it ends up behaving like a tabloid.

    5. denyer-no1-fan on

      >Mahmood will argue next week that migration policies – including forcing people to wait 20 years before being able to claim leave to remain – were entirely consistent with Labour values. Those changes are expected to be implemented in the autumn.

      I’d argue that one of Labour values is social justice, changing the terms of indefinite leave to remain halfway through someone’s time in the UK is an unjust system.

    6. Jared_Usbourne on

      Swear some people on Reddit have the reading comprehension of a parrot.

      You don’t get asked to leave unless your country is deemed safe, and it doesn’t apply to existing asylum seekers.

    Leave A Reply