Share.

    22 commenti

    1. gopoohgo on

      Will the Royal Navy object? Battle of Jutland sinking probably makes it a pretty important name.

    2. Did he say it was a new class ? I understood it was just a new ship of the Triomphant class.

    3. RealToiletPaper007 on

      I much prefer when ships and submarines are named after relevant people or places, rather than these sort of “populistic” name approaches.

    4. Swesteel on

      I call dibs on ”the unsinkable” thou- wait, why are you all leaving?

    5. Invisible is a more preferred trait in submarines than invincible

    6. BenjiSBRK on

      I’m not superstitious but can we please find another name ?

    7. Loud-Start1394 on

      I think it should be “le invincible” but ok whatever 

      Edit: this was a joke hahaha 

    8. spam__likely on

      invincible, unsinkable…. Haven’t we seen this movie?

    9. ScottyBoneman on

      Canada needs to buy a couple of these. Far more than we need F-35s.

    10. A name like that is just tempting fate. The gods love irony.

    11. SowingSalt on

      I would have liked them to reuse the Jean Bart and Richelieu names.

    12. It’s usually not a good idea to name something invncible. Spain did, everyone has been memeing for centuries.

      Titanic was unsinkable, didn’t work out either

    Leave A Reply