Share.

3 commenti

  1. AllThatIHaveDone on

    Understandable. Collecting their fingerprints and DNA would make it really difficult for them to commit crimes, right enough.

  2. UnoriginalWebHandle on

    Crazy that a fifth of officers haven’t even had their fingerprints scanned. That should have been SOP for longer than any active police officers have been alive.

  3. Street-Team3977 on

    Worth mentioning, the point of this is to precent officer DNA causing confusion at crimes scenes, not to act as a reserve for investigating officers’ offences.

    So while it may be used for that purpose (and I suppose the objection is framed from that standpoint), that’s not the justification for it (and actually that would likely not be legal as a standalone justification).

    Which makes this a procedural issue, not a misconduct one.

    (Also I daresay most of the officers not on file will just either be quite new, or in roles where there’s no chance they’ll be at crime scenes personally).

Leave A Reply