Share.

    3 commenti

    1. AllThatIHaveDone on

      Understandable. Collecting their fingerprints and DNA would make it really difficult for them to commit crimes, right enough.

    2. UnoriginalWebHandle on

      Crazy that a fifth of officers haven’t even had their fingerprints scanned. That should have been SOP for longer than any active police officers have been alive.

    3. Street-Team3977 on

      Worth mentioning, the point of this is to precent officer DNA causing confusion at crimes scenes, not to act as a reserve for investigating officers’ offences.

      So while it may be used for that purpose (and I suppose the objection is framed from that standpoint), that’s not the justification for it (and actually that would likely not be legal as a standalone justification).

      Which makes this a procedural issue, not a misconduct one.

      (Also I daresay most of the officers not on file will just either be quite new, or in roles where there’s no chance they’ll be at crime scenes personally).

    Leave A Reply