Share.

13 commenti

  1. **Key Findings**

    * The estimated number of females in employment stood at 1,328,900 in Q4 2025, an 82.1% increase from 729,900 reported in Q4 2000.

    * The number of women who reported their Principal Economic Status as “engaged in home duties” decreased by 61.8% from 520,500 in 2010 to 198,800 in 2025.

    * In Q4 2025, females accounted for 41.7% of persons in full-time employment, and 67.1% of persons in part-time employment.

    * Females represented over three-quarters (75.9%) of employees in the Human Health & Social Work sector, and just under three-quarters of the Education sector (74.9%) in Q4 2025.

    * More than six in ten (63.6%) females in employment had a third level degree compared with 52.8% of males in Q4 2025.

    * Median weekly earnings among female employments rose by 39.2% between 2014 (€469.85) and 2024 (€654.07). This compares with an increase of 36.5% in median weekly earnings among male employments over the same period, from €587.52 in 2014 to €802.14 in 2024.

    * The proportion of females among the top 1% of earners increased by five percentage points from 22.6% in 2019 to 27.6% in 2024, while the proportion of females in employments with earnings in the top 10% rose from 27.9% to 30.6% over the same period.

    * In 2022, the Gender Pay Gap (GPG), which was measured as the average difference between male and female hourly earnings, was 9.6%, with mean hourly earnings for males at €27.73 and €25.06 for females.

    http://cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-wlm/womeninthelabourmarket2024-2025/keyfindings/

  2. Action_Limp on

    It’s great there’s more parity in the workforce, but I also think it underpins the idea that the stay-at-home-parent approach to family planning is becoming a dream for the top 1%.

  3. Sporshie on

    As a woman I take pride in my career and am very glad I have equal opportunities for work, but we should really be working fewer hours if we have more people in the workforce. I don’t know how couples are meant to manage the household and raise kids while both working 40 hours, which for a lot of people would be required to afford a house or live comfortably.

  4. SmartPomegranate4833 on

    And still the childcare model does not reflect this and only adds to a mother’s mental load.

  5. sureyouknowurself on

    And now both parents have to work. That’s the lie we got sold on. Both parents now need to work to maintain the same quality of life ( in most cases a worse quality of life than previous generations )

  6. Maliciouswoot on

    and we took all that extra family income and ploughed it straight into house prices… good job us!

  7. Archamasse on

    There will be a load of commentary about stay at home parents not being as possible, and there’s some merit in that, but I cannot understate how important it is for women to have their own means in as much as possible. It is good that this many women *can* work outside the home, and any clown who tries to tell you otherwise needs to have a chat with some older women about how life was for them and their friends when it wasn’t the case. 

    If you do not or can not work outside the home, have money stashed somewhere that only you know about or can access.

  8. JackC747 on

    You would hope that if 1 man could support a family with a stay at home wife, if you then had a similar family 30 years later but with both the husband and the wife working that they would have the same quality of life (similar sized house at least for example) but with double the disposable income.

    But instead, because everybody started having more income, all prices just rose to get the the point that they were just expensive enough that people are willing to pay for them.

  9. tsubatai on

    2 income household started as an option, perhaps even a luxury, but is now a necessity.

  10. Willing-Departure115 on

    It’s a measure of a changing society. We are so far behind on the supports for this, however – in particular affordable childcare.

  11. ConfusedCelt on

    Pretty sure the reality is less about positive choice feminism and more about having no other option. Painting the fact that two wages are required to just have the entry into existing whereas one wage used to be enough as a positive seems insidious imo. Pretty sure early feminists were hoping their single wage would carry as far as a working man’s at the time not halving both

  12. OutInABlazeOfGlory on

    “Females”

    Stop this bullshit I stg. You do not use the same words we use for cattle or biology for a social class. It’s disrespectful how normalized it’s becoming.

Leave A Reply