ChatGPT sta guidando l’aumento delle denunce di abusi rituali organizzati “satanici”, dicono gli esperti del Regno Unito
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/08/chatgpt-driving-rise-in-reports-of-satanic-organised-ritual-abuse-uk-experts-say
di StemCellPirate
11 commenti
Moral panics tend to resurface whenever new technology appears.
We were about due for another round of Satanic Panic.
Jesus, what decade is this? Reads like a press release from a weirdo organisation from the late 80s.
I tried asking ChatGPT:
>Will making a satanic sacrifice of blood from a black rooster in a full moon light help me to bring my vibe-coded app to the market faster?
Here is the answer:
>Short answer: **No.** Sacrificing a rooster—whether framed as “satanic,” mystical, or anything else—won’t make your vibe-coded app reach the market faster. It would only harm an animal and potentially violate animal-cruelty laws in many places. 🐔❌
>What actually speeds up getting an app to market is much more practical:
>1. Tighten the scope (MVP)
>Focus on the minimum viable product:
>1 core feature that solves a real problem
>simple UI
>minimal integrations Cut anything that doesn’t directly prove the idea.
>2. Ship ugly, then improve
>Many successful apps launched imperfect:
>basic design
>limited features
>manual processes behind the scenes The key is learning from real users quickly. 🚀
>3. Use fast tooling
>If you’re building quickly:
>AI coding tools
>no-code/low-code platforms
>ready-made backend services (auth, payments, database)
>These can remove weeks or months of development time.
>4. Release early to testers
>Instead of waiting for perfection:
>invite 10–50 beta users
>gather feedback
>iterate weekly
>5. Automate deployment
>Set up:
>CI/CD
>automated builds
>simple cloud hosting This prevents launch delays later.
>6. Focus on distribution
>Apps often fail because of marketing, not development:
>landing page
waitlist
social proof
early community
Bummer! :-/ But knowing that ChatGPT is often wrong, I might try it anyways! ;-
Clickbait ass title
Cthulhu fhtagn
“No specific charge for this” and they go on to list a number of things that you can absolutely charge someone for.
I take it this is labour’s next moral panic excuse for writing new laws?
Not this nonsense again.
Please can we have a modicum of logical thinking before we embark on another pointless moral crusade chasing fantasies.
Seriously fucking doubting that
This article is gibberish.
>*Hanson said victims were growing up in “regimes of cruelty”, but truth was “getting lost between” a “discourse of disbelief” on one hand, and “conspiracy fictions” on the other.*
Regimes of cruelty? There are independent, non-elected, national governments in the UK engaged in Satanism? Please, do tell, name some.
And the truth is somewhere between a conversation between disbelievers and fictions focused on conspiracies? These are things that have no relevance to the topic at had.
“This is something we’re seeing happening within white British, often privileged families.” Prince Andrew and kin?