*Shabana Mahmood will deport thousands of foreign criminals and failed asylum seekers before they can use human rights laws to appeal and block their removals.*
*The Home Secretary is to use laws drawn up by Sir Tony Blair’s Labour government to remove them as soon as their asylum claims are rejected so that they can only appeal once they are back in their home countries.*
Sounds pretty reasonable.
Jaded_Strain_3753 on
Good. Now let’s see if she can get it past her own MPs
No-Risk-2584 on
I’m actually really impressed with Mahmood
This a good move, there’s no reason we should be paying for them to stay here while they appeal.
andrew0256 on
If asylum and irregular migration processing had kept up with demand there would be no need for this. It would be accepted practice.
GMN123 on
To find out the results of your asylum claim you should have to attend a room at Heathrow airport. If you’re approved you stay. If you aren’t you are put on a plane.
Naugrith on
I’m pretty left wing, but I think this is just common sense. No idea why it isn’t already standard practice.
quantum_splicer on
Why not make it so that any human rights claim must be lodged before exhaustion of asylum claim and the appellate process.
dcnb65 on
If your asylum case has failed, you have no right to be here. If you have committed a serious crime, you have forfeited your right to be here.
8 commenti
*Shabana Mahmood will deport thousands of foreign criminals and failed asylum seekers before they can use human rights laws to appeal and block their removals.*
*The Home Secretary is to use laws drawn up by Sir Tony Blair’s Labour government to remove them as soon as their asylum claims are rejected so that they can only appeal once they are back in their home countries.*
Sounds pretty reasonable.
Good. Now let’s see if she can get it past her own MPs
I’m actually really impressed with Mahmood
This a good move, there’s no reason we should be paying for them to stay here while they appeal.
If asylum and irregular migration processing had kept up with demand there would be no need for this. It would be accepted practice.
To find out the results of your asylum claim you should have to attend a room at Heathrow airport. If you’re approved you stay. If you aren’t you are put on a plane.
I’m pretty left wing, but I think this is just common sense. No idea why it isn’t already standard practice.
Why not make it so that any human rights claim must be lodged before exhaustion of asylum claim and the appellate process.
If your asylum case has failed, you have no right to be here. If you have committed a serious crime, you have forfeited your right to be here.