Share.

23 commenti

  1. Here is a country that is threatening to invade and annex our territory. Hey let’s give them more military access to said territory!

  2. pickus_dickus on

    Donnie have recently said the US don’t need NATO. Greenland is an indirect member of NATO through Denmark. The us doesn’t need NATO which mean they can’t have shit on Greenland.

  3. Ada_Pearce on

    Absolutely not, after seeing his iran disaster the last thing any country should do is let him have more military bases

  4. EINFACH_NUR_DAEMLICH on

    They should seek access to three new ways to go fuck themselves.

  5. USA: “We’re going to leave NATO because we don’t need you and you suck.”

    Also the USA: “We want more bases on your terrritory.”

  6. Blubbolo on

    Its time to be reasonable adults and sit down to trade.

    The US gets a new base but they have to send to the sun anyone who agreed, supported or funded the pedophile.

  7. Crazy-Canuck463 on

    Sure. Once you fix the massive fuck up in the middle east you caused.

  8. ThoseAreMyFeet on

    Let me imagine the response..

    >Hahahaha,
    >Fuck off. 

  9. fiendishrabbit on

    Note that these are not new rights or really anything new. This is merely negotiation teams trying to repair the damage caused by the Trump government.

    Since WWII there has been an extensive defensive treaty between Denmark and US (reinforcing the 1918 treaty where the US recognizes danish sovereignty over Greenland) where the US have had rights to establish military bases and defensive areas as needed (under the supervision of NATO and under negotiations with Denmark).

    The only reason why there is only 1 US military base on Greenland at the moment is because the US military gradually dismantled their military presence until only the current Pituffik Space Base was left (to provide communication and missile warning coverage over the north pole)

  10. Bitter_Particular_75 on

    Would you let Russia have 3 new defence areas in Greenland?

    No?

    What’s the difference?

  11. Korkikrac on

    Is it normal for a sovereign country to have a foreign army on its own soil? Especially when that army threatens annexation. Things have been upside down in Europe for far too long.

  12. dakjelle on

    They used to have several pretty big bases there and numerous radar stations.

    And they’re welcome to return as it always was the agreement.

    Which is why it never made sense that Trump wanted.. Nevermind it’s Trump and the word sense.. Hahaha

  13. WhisperingHammer on

    Inwould assume those are the areas they intend to ravage for materials.

Leave A Reply