Share.

16 commenti

  1. trmetroidmaniac on

    35 countries join to twiddle their thumbs until Israel and America give up on the war they started

  2. Ok this is a genuinely admirable show of leadership by us, kind of proof of what we can do when we’re not just a US lieutenant, and have our own independent foreign policy.

    Leadership of the middle powers is definitely something we’re capable of.

    We’re a middle power now, but we’ve still got the muscle memory of a great power meaning we feel compelled to lead like this, a good thing in my opinion.

    Be proud people, because we genuinely should be at this.

  3. Electricbell20 on

    Interesting to see the UK take the leadership in this considering how some political podcast people seemed to be saying Starmer wouldn’t have the ability.

  4. 35 countries in one room feels less like diplomacy and more like the world’s most chaotic group project.

  5. Popular_Register_440 on

    Can he get rid of Farage while he’s at it, send him packing to Epstein’s island or something and rejoin the EU as well?

    Starmer getting a few things right 👏

  6. Dando_Calrisian on

    I’ve got a wild idea. Stop bombing Iran. They’ll probably reopen the water, they hadn’t closed it before they were attacked.

  7. lxlviperlxl on

    Would be interesting to know why China, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Spain and Oman weren’t invited. Outside of Qatar and Saudi, these countries aren’t blindly loyal to the states or Israel.

    These countries would have way greater impact on these talks than 75% of the countries listed.

  8. Old_Course9344 on

    Why does the UK need to be the country to host or chair this meeting?

    Why can’t another country do it, and invite us along?

  9. Individual-Cancel778 on

    UK look at us big important country!
    Sure the other 34 will be putting take over bids

  10. PsychologySpecific16 on

    Glad we are showing political leadership. Well as long as something comes of it.

    Annoying almost no politician (with a few notable exceptions) took the warnings about the straight if Hormuz seriously. Despite defence types warning of a similar situation for years.

    Decimated the minehunter fleet (along with everything else) through sale, scrapping & lack of replacements.

  11. facefirst0 on

    Step 1: The US ceases attacking Iran and withdraws.
    Step 2: Iran re-opens the strait

  12. Sensitive_Double8652 on

    Maybe Iran should be at the meeting, let the USA and Israel find another route, I would happily do a deal that specifically bans US and Israel from using the straight if that’s what It takes to ensure the safety of Hormuz

  13. Another meeting, no doubt then Starmer will call a meeting to discuss the meeting and the meeting after that.

  14. Ok_Bite_9633 on

    What once took the royal navy now needs support from 35 nations.

  15. ash_ninetyone on

    This should not include the US, since they weren’t including anyone else in their decision to fuck things up.

    Feel free to negotiate an opening to shipping traffic for any ship that doesn’t head to the US

    Edit: just read that bit

    > The U.S. is not among the countries attending Thursday’s meeting. Trump has said securing the waterway is not America’s job, and told U.S. allies to “go get your own oil.”

    Can’t wait for Trump’s next release being

    “Our so-called allies did not invite the US to negotiations after all we’ve done for them. Sad. Hormuz cannot reopen without US.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter”

  16. Honestly I was very against Stamer prior to this stuff. He has absolutely won me over. I still strongly disagree with a lot of his internal policy however

Leave A Reply