L’UE sta cercando di cacciare via i ricercatori americani, promettendo una migliore qualità della vita anziché un lavoro ben retribuito

https://www.euractiv.com/opinion/europes-battle-for-american-talent/

di Creative_Hunter_6137

22 commenti

  1. TatarAmerican on

    It will be a tough sell since most of them also hold teaching positions, allowing them sabbaticals every three to five years and four months of (potential) vacation time every year. They also have access to some of the best healthcare available in the US…

  2. im_just_using_logic on

    The EU should also be more dedicated in raising productivity in order to pay higher wages.

  3. i_no_can_eat on

    What about better conditions and stability for the ones that are already here?

  4. Additional-Read2676 on

    “quality of life” lmao

    good luck convincing american professors that earning 4-5k eur gross in paris, amsterdam or munich and spending 60% or more of your salary on rent of 40-50 m2 flat is “quality living”

  5. Plenty_Beautiful_547 on

    God knows they fall short in the high paying jobs front

  6. New_Passage9166 on

    Poaching US researchers is maybe a bold statement given that many of those researchers are European and holding citizenship in European countries while working in the US after being poached.

  7. edparadox on

    > The EU is trying to poach American researchers, promising a better quality of life rather than high-paying job

    If you call that poach I wonder how you would call the decades since WWII in the US.

  8. IamHumanAndINeed on

    Start by preventing EU citizens to leave to the US for such position instead of poaching americans …

  9. inetguy101 on

    An offer that misses the target audience. The question that needs to be answered is how the EU would be able to help researchers to be more productive.
    Good researchers are in my experience not motivated by money nor quality of life, but their impact and recognition of their peers in their respective scientific field.
    So what should be done is an effort to minimize everything that is not research related. No mandate to teach, minimize burocratic burdens for funds and experimental setups (safety/ethics/budget, etc.)
    Additionaly labor rules should be relaxed, with 40 h/week you will never get in front of any competitive scientific field.

  10. AlfredsChild on

    South Korea alone is competitive in terms of drug development when put against the entirety of the EU. It’s not a lack of researchers that is causing that. The EU needs a better regulatory and financial environment to open up the potential for science. Trying to coax a handful of American-based researchers to move to the EU is a hopeless task.

  11. dragon_irl on

    European research is somewhat competitive actually, we’re just hilariously bad at converting research success into business.

    Which is a big reason why do many European researchers are leaving for the US. They want to productize their research, not spend their career writing grants for EU programs 

  12. StevenAdamsInDallas on

    Lol. Quality of life with all the 3rd world coming here. No thanks.

  13. isUKexactlyTsameasUS on

    FIXED IT FOR YA…

    Alternatively, and from personal experience thru our circle of canadian, yanks and brex-exits-eers,

    the EU really doesn’t need to ”poach” American or any other anglo researchers – as there is a far higher QoL,

    one that sometimes even promises a high*paying job as well – esp when all other factors are all weighed up.

    In NorthWesternEurope, the ability to live without actually owning cars is really under-reported / under-rated.

    (high*paying for researchers, not the other everyday stuff)

  14. justarandomuser10 on

    No American is coming from 200K+ to 50K here. Sure, you can try to manipulate them by using healthcare benefits and stuff, but there is no need at all. Its more cost effective and smart to hire domestic. There is no shortage here.

  15. the private health insurance system in the US managed to convince an entire generation that they actually have higher salaries than everyone else

    when they actually take you back all the difference and more at the first time you sneeze

  16. Sea-Feedback-2424 on

    It’s not just pay. Whe. K was working in the US Tthr organization I worked for had group policy insurance – nonqjesriond asked, you paid for it and subsidized by the company.

    There is peace of mind with short term disability, long term disability, life insurance, accjdentall death, disability insurance, and disability insurance for about $300 per month versus the amount I would pay out of pocket in Germsny at close to €1100.

  17. Green_Rays on

    After completing my PhD in the Netherlands and Belgium, I joined a major semiconductor company in San Jose in a role that aligned perfectly with my dissertation. My starting salary was $220K, and today my wife and I together earn north of half a million dollars annually.

    When I was job hunting in the Netherlands, most opportunities I found were relatively low-paid engineering roles. And it’s not only about the salary… the number of relevant openings was also very limited. In Western Europe, the only organizations that really matched my background were NXP in Nijmegen, imec in Leuven, IBM in Zurich, and Infineon in Munich. Unfortunately, none of them were hiring for roles that suited my expertise at the time.

    In contrast, in the U.S. I came across dozens of positions that were an excellent fit, and hundreds more that I would have gladly taken.

    There really was no comparison.

  18. Aeon_Return on

    I support this, provided they perform careful screenings.

  19. vikiiingur on

    LOL, if they think a top researcher is going to work for peanuts, they are pretty deluded

Leave A Reply