Tag
Austria
Belgio
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cechia
Croatia
Croazia
Czech
Czechia
Czech Republic
Danimarca
Denmark
Estonia
Europa
Europe
France
Francia
Germania
Germany
Grecia
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Irlanda
Polonia
Polska
Portogallo
Portugal
Regno Unito
Repubblica Ceca
Repubblica di Turchia
Romania
Serbia
Slovacchia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Svezia
Sweden
Turchia
Turkey
Ucraina
Ucraino
Ukraine
Ungheria
United Kingdom

6 commenti
That is a bit weird to me.
How can they compare a statistic that is normalized by the number of people, with one that is absolute?
That would make sense to cap the index the median salary of the federal staff with the national median salary, but use the median salary as an index for the total budget?
This initiative is brought to you by MCKinsey and Co, who will do the work instead.
Is it still an unintended consequence if it is intended but not disclosed to the voter?
Do I understand this correctly, that this is an initiative to either lower the salary of federal workers, fire federal workers or potentially both?
They don’t even bother to focus on specific sectors, usually I would expect demands to cut social security, less foreign help or making it harder to get benefits. Just plainly less money across the board, austerity in its purest form.
So the initiative is gonna win because the average voter thinks that politicians are bad people and don’t deserve money ever for no reason at all.
I can already see my canton vote 60% in favour.
Cut spending on public services so that the quality declines so that people are angry so that you are “forced” to privatize them.
End result is worse public services that cost more. But hey, at least a few rich people pay less tax and a few other rich people get to make some money from “selling” their crap alternatives and it’s not like they use those public services anyway.
No thank you. This helps no one.
I like my government providing world class public service without waiting times or having to pay petty bribes.