Perché pensi che Faik Konica abbia menzionato le macchie di sangue di cui non ho visto sulla spada di Skanderbeg quando ce l’ha descritta nei libri, ma non la scritta araba su di essa?

Because he has his biases like anyone else does, why else? Not really that interesting.

Well. If there were bloodstains on that sword, it would’ve been very rusty as blood contains both water and salt. He maybe tried to be metaphorical about it. Or just straight up lied.

Damascening ,Damascus steel

What’s the point of this post? Please explain your narrative before asking for ours.
Pretty sure Faik Konica was metaphorically speaking. If you’ve read all his literature you would have known.

I don’t think blood stains will survive that long without proper care. Blood can oxidize and go away fast. But the sword looks decorative not actually something you can use in battle. Maybe Faik Konica used symbolism in his writing.

Arsyetimi i ketij postimi eshte po aq pa lidhje sa dhe fakti qe ti flet anglisht ne nje komunitet shqiptar.

Letra e firmosjes se pavarsise ne Vlore u shkrua ne arabisht

Skanderbeg’s curved, damascene steel sword, likely from the 15th-century Balkans or Middle East, features an Ottoman Turkish inscription in Arabic script that reads “Libehadur Allah Iskander beg,” translating to “Champion of God, Skanderbeg”. The blade includes gold-inlaid medallions with this text and other decorative, partly imitation Arabic, script

The inscription serves as both a personal moniker and a talismanic, protective phrase invoking divine favor in battle

The sword was likely a gift or acquired during his time in the Ottoman military, where such opulent, damascened weapons were common for commanders, with some accounts suggesting it was a gift from a Sultan.

You also need to note that sword you see there is not the sword used in any battle that is a decorative Damascus steel sword worn after a battle during a return worn more as a symbol of power and stature than it was a battle weapon

Swords in battle were often a lot shorter than the swords we see on display for knights kings lords etc because a big heavy sword is actually very detrimental in combat. You can swing a short sword and wield a light small shield far more effectively

The curved scimitar (kilij) was the weapon he actually fought along with most soldiers of that era it was a curved blade that was short medium sized that was used to stab thru shields by having a curved blade it made blocking a stab more tricky as you could go wide around a shield etc reach over etc and it allowed for a thinner lighter sword due to the curve without breaking allowing faster swinging

https://imgur.com/a/k85XJdF

Also like 99% of swords we find are these nice preserved ones with fancy insertions and gold likely decorative swords as the blades are to unblemished and used like they’ve never seen battle

The ones used in battle likely had inferior metals mixed in for cost cutting or just resources and rusted out laying in the hands of fallen men didn’t include gold or lettering etc

Skënderbeu ka fol shumë gjuhë. Plus ne s’kemi pas metalurgji. Shpatën arabët do ja kenë berë.