Share.

    23 commenti

    1. LyingFacts on

      He’s also one of tax payers biggest receivers….

      But let’s all day Bank Holiday Monday run dis and mis info surrounding benefits claimants to which most work and are pensioners. The others are seriously ill and disabled.

      Just for those to whom don’t know, you can’t get max benefits which is less than £745 PIP a month, not a week, a month! For “mild anxiety”

      We are daily being lied to.

    2. jameshgordy on

      “Man benefitting from compulsory raffle contest with no prizes buys raffle tickets”

    3. JustJavi on

      He is also one of the biggest receivers and one of the richest persons in the country.

    4. >It is understood the prince pays the highest marginal rate of tax, 45 per cent, on his personal earnings.

      >However, he has no legal obligation to do so due to an agreement made between the Treasury and the late Queen Elizabeth II in 2013.

      IT IS UNDERSTOOD

      You guys making up things, then.

      The second bit you didn’t make up, though. He is indeed above the law, not like you plebs

    5. No_Atmosphere8146 on

      He’s got one the biggest height to width head ratios I’ve even seen. 

    6. DustOk6712 on

      Poor Prince, must hurt to pay tax on the tax he recieved.

    7. No_Title_5126 on

      Man profits from inherited wealth.

      Isn’t this part of the problem with the UK?

    8. Lone-Wolf-86 on

      One of the biggest tax payers. Yet it’s the tax payers who pay for their whole existence.

    9. Angryscotsmin on

      Another thread of rancid replies perfectly demonstrating that ‘making the rich pay’ isn’t about paying a fair share, it’s just about jealousy and hating the rich. Those of you saying he was born into privilege are right – he could be using that privilege to dodge obscene amounts of tax if he wanted.

    10. Davman65 on

      This is like me giving someone £10,000 and they giving me 20 pence back.

    11. Trundlenator on

      Seeing as a lot of people here love to bash the royal family I just wanted to say something for once.

      Abolishing the monarchy does not guarantee a better country. Look at who’s running the country now voted in by us and how disappointing the decision making has been.

      We’ve had the OSA, Mandelson appointment, Raynor failure and who knows what else is coming in the rest of this term.

      Abolishing the monarchy does not guarantee we’d put something good in its place and I don’t trust myself and the rest of this country to be good decision makers anymore.

      I’m not proud of much in this country(including our flawed monarchy) but I’m more ashamed of people who’d vote reform/greens than I am of the monarchy(also ashamed of reform/green regardless of their stance on the monarchy).

      This is not a ‘defending the monarchy’ comment, just saying they’re the lesser of two evils (neither the monarchy or parliament/voting public are good currently) when I look at a voting public I also don’t trust currently.

    12. MirkwoodWanderer1 on

      Think the cost of royal family is worth it for the soft power they provide and the ease of our government not needing a president.

      It’s training people from birth to be diplomats.

    13. What is it as a % of income? Speaking in absolutes is completely disingenuous. Working people are paying effective rates of 30 or 40%. What is theirs?

    14. Samethyst1967 on

      Prince William has major shares in Blackrock !…..read about there history …..also being the duchy of Cornwall one of the biggest slumlords in Britain …I don’t have a problem with monarchy but I do have a problem with hypocrisy

    15. Archaemenes on

      I don’t take pleasure in debating monarchists anymore because I know they’re supporting a losing position. Young people are much, much less in favour of a monarchy. I have no doubt I’ll live to see a King William but I’m also quite certain he’s the last King we’ll ever see.

    16. 7/20 is abt 35% .. abt the same as anybody in th higher bands

    17. Maybe I’m just a dumb American but it was my understanding their pay comes from the estates and other businesses. Obviously they have a huge leg up but I didn’t think the tax payers were supporting them?

    18. Appropriate_Tax2602 on

      Oh quelle surprised…only a few months bsck he hires a crisis manager and ever since then it’s subtle clapbacks at anything nenative siad about him…laziness…suddenly he is doing a load of engagements, not transparent on taxes suddenly we have him revealing it …wwll this year anyway what about all the previous yrs…this will shut us up and he will go bsck to hiding it in future years of which he will probably pay naff all and we wont know but oh remmeber this year see he does pay…yeah yeah good luck trying to fool us, until you show it every yr im not falling for it

    19. Dial-Appreciator on

      And how much of our tax does he get back? He’s a nice man but come on now.

    20. Not really. He takes with one hand and supposedly gives with the other.

      Still a parasite. Cromwell had the right idea.

    21. Background_Sun_9214 on

      It’s almost like we are getting our own money back…almost…

    22. Hertfordgal on

      Another hem sniffer promoting these leaches that simply should not be the tax payer’s burden.
      More tourists visit the palace of Versailles than Buckingham Palace, without a royal family there.
      They come to visit buildings that us tax payers pay for.
      The head of the Church of England is a corrupt adulterous bore.

    23. MCdeltatree on

      And how does he make so much money to be one of the UKs highest tax payers? His bloodline. Not a business he started, or a job he does, just because he was born that way.

    Leave A Reply