Just in time to shift blame to the next government on its effects.
Old-Associate3589 on
This government really is the worst
Beyond_the_one on
Time for a wild cat strike. When talking fails, civil disobedience is necessary.
Aggravating-Ear-5880 on
This is good for immigrants or unemployed because it lowers risks in hiring.
Resident_Draw_8785 on
Not to be the voice of reason here and probably this is gonna deliver down votes but this is very normal in other EU countries.
However there is also a maximum amount of fixed term contracts that can be provided and minimum compensation and thats what they forgot to add to this law.
radiopelican on
According to the article, the main criticism was that this law was pushed through a little too quickly, and conversations weren’t had with the right parties. Are we assuming that if the conversations had been had but the vote was the same, we would be okay with that? I’m trying to wrap my head around it.
yksvaan on
There’s a strange way of thinking that everyone is entitled to have a permanent job but world doesn’t work like that. Almost seems like it’s s easier to get a divorce than fire someone.
The problem in Finnish job market has always been stiffness, both by legislation and in larger companies HR department. It’s no surprise there’s a ton of staffing agencies and recently more entrepreneurs as subcontractors. They exist because companies are ready to pay extra for flexibility and ease.
7 commenti
Just in time to shift blame to the next government on its effects.
This government really is the worst
Time for a wild cat strike. When talking fails, civil disobedience is necessary.
This is good for immigrants or unemployed because it lowers risks in hiring.
Not to be the voice of reason here and probably this is gonna deliver down votes but this is very normal in other EU countries.
However there is also a maximum amount of fixed term contracts that can be provided and minimum compensation and thats what they forgot to add to this law.
According to the article, the main criticism was that this law was pushed through a little too quickly, and conversations weren’t had with the right parties. Are we assuming that if the conversations had been had but the vote was the same, we would be okay with that? I’m trying to wrap my head around it.
There’s a strange way of thinking that everyone is entitled to have a permanent job but world doesn’t work like that. Almost seems like it’s s easier to get a divorce than fire someone.
The problem in Finnish job market has always been stiffness, both by legislation and in larger companies HR department. It’s no surprise there’s a ton of staffing agencies and recently more entrepreneurs as subcontractors. They exist because companies are ready to pay extra for flexibility and ease.