Il piano di riforma della pubblica amministrazione del Regno Unito “licenzierebbe più addetti alla pianificazione di quanti ne esistano”
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/may/26/reform-civil-service-plan-would-sack-more-planning-officers-than-exist
di topotaul
13 commenti
that’s the way to make sure you completely eliminate waste. sack everyone, imagine more people, and sack them too
Reform should be a collection of writers that specialise in weird fiction…
I’m not saying that all reform voters are stupid but I’m yet to find one that I’d consider intelligent.
Many people should be going more on the offense with regards to *some* people who want to cut more and more from the public sector. The country doesn’t have much of a backbone without it. We should be focused on strengthening it so the country becomes more capable, and can protect itself from *some* people who ultimately want to break things so they takeover (disaster capitalism). “Britain is broken” after all.
Rightwingers go “hurr durr public sector doesn’t do anything” when they are harming it, so that’s even more bullshit, in addition to things like their sudden obsession about mass immigration when they did little over the Boriswave…or should that be called Rightwingwave?
“Boriswave”, according to https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/54747-boriswave-broken-through-or-still-just-a-mantra-of-the-online-right, wasn’t really a term until mid-2024. Hey, isn’t that when Labour took over? There seems to be significant revisionism going on here, and many millions should know about it.
It’s going to be a very dark chapter in our nation’s history; let’s hope it is brief.
Gut the country’s ability to do anything, then pillage and loot till the next election! The trump way.
> the paper calls for a “reduction of 450 FTEs in planning, accounting for £40m a year”. According to the 2025 statistics for civil servants employed in each role, however, there are only 445 planners employed across the civil service in Britain
> Asked how it would be possible to sack more planners than existed, a Reform spokesperson said the total included 440 people employed as planning inspectors at the MHCLG. “Our number stands,” they said.
So the Guardian got it wrong.
Leftists bricking it and trying to hide it by making stupid jokes about Reform. 🤣
You’re joking.
Reform Ltd policies usually seem so well-informed.
The saddest part of that is I am not suprised in the slightest, nor am I suprised or shocked by their polling numbers.
If something touches their bias they will believe anything a figure says on it.
The comments are quite telling, even supporters aren’t calling out how utterly stupid it is.
Oh dear the jobs for life in the cs will be gutted.
Actually pretty gentle with the cut, only 13% FTE reduction and mostly focused on HR, much less than the Consvervative and Labour targets in the past and present.
Seems like the difference is because Reform counted 440 from an ALB as civil servants, while the report is about a disagreement in definition but the title makes it seem like ‘Reform is trying to gut the civil service clean’.
I don’t support Reform one bit but I want to be fair to not reduce myself down to their standards.
Just like Trump, sack all, and pretend all is good. More money for them to steal