Spændende at se, hvor den lander. Men tankerne bag forekommer ikke at være helt ude i hampen (selv om der ser ud til at være en del elastik i). Fra artiklen:
*A cross-party agreement backed by 80% of parliament promised to push the datacentres of US tech giants to the back of the queue for scarce grid capacity. “Ordinary” households, hospitals and companies would get priority.*
*Behind the rhetoric, the* [*draft bill*](https://www.ft.dk/samling/20252/almdel/KEF/bilag/72/index.htm) *would give lowest priority to any datacentre but those serving worthy societal functions such as health, defence or emergency services. Datacentres supporting Danish business competitiveness might also get priority, the parties* [*agreed*](https://www.ft.dk/samling/20252/almdel/KEF/spm/36/index.htm) *in June. Low-ranked projects might redeem themselves by being grid-friendly. The bill left worthiness and friendliness undefined.*
1timestop on
I get the point. But as EU, we are way behind the wave. We have been with Ev, now we are with AI and data center. Is it good for the nature/habitat. No. Can we find another way? Maybe. But if we start with NO, in a few years we will regret it.
Big-Today6819 on
Måske der skulle være mere fokus på at forbedre nettet, sætte mere vind og sol energi op til lands, det virker desværre til politikerne vil løse problemerne ved at flytte datacentre til andre lande og ellers levere et lorte projekt til danskerne med et energinet der står med flammer i maskinrummet.
anoryger on
Vandforbruget er ligeledes et kæmpe problem, såvel som energiforbruget. Det er rart at se, nogen har fornuft endnu.
NejTakSletIkke on
Regeringsgrundlaget taler om at:
* accelerere brugen af AI
* udskifte 30.000 offentligt ansatte med AI
* oprette en AI accelerationsfond
Det vil kræve MERE energi brugt på AI datacentre, ikke MINDRE
5 commenti
Spændende at se, hvor den lander. Men tankerne bag forekommer ikke at være helt ude i hampen (selv om der ser ud til at være en del elastik i). Fra artiklen:
*A cross-party agreement backed by 80% of parliament promised to push the datacentres of US tech giants to the back of the queue for scarce grid capacity. “Ordinary” households, hospitals and companies would get priority.*
*Behind the rhetoric, the* [*draft bill*](https://www.ft.dk/samling/20252/almdel/KEF/bilag/72/index.htm) *would give lowest priority to any datacentre but those serving worthy societal functions such as health, defence or emergency services. Datacentres supporting Danish business competitiveness might also get priority, the parties* [*agreed*](https://www.ft.dk/samling/20252/almdel/KEF/spm/36/index.htm) *in June. Low-ranked projects might redeem themselves by being grid-friendly. The bill left worthiness and friendliness undefined.*
I get the point. But as EU, we are way behind the wave. We have been with Ev, now we are with AI and data center. Is it good for the nature/habitat. No. Can we find another way? Maybe. But if we start with NO, in a few years we will regret it.
Måske der skulle være mere fokus på at forbedre nettet, sætte mere vind og sol energi op til lands, det virker desværre til politikerne vil løse problemerne ved at flytte datacentre til andre lande og ellers levere et lorte projekt til danskerne med et energinet der står med flammer i maskinrummet.
Vandforbruget er ligeledes et kæmpe problem, såvel som energiforbruget. Det er rart at se, nogen har fornuft endnu.
Regeringsgrundlaget taler om at:
* accelerere brugen af AI
* udskifte 30.000 offentligt ansatte med AI
* oprette en AI accelerationsfond
Det vil kræve MERE energi brugt på AI datacentre, ikke MINDRE