Ho messo insieme questa infografica che mappa la regressività strutturale del sistema fiscale polacco, affiancandola ai dati provenienti da Stati Uniti e Paesi Bassi utilizzando l’Osservatorio fiscale dell’UE "reddito economico" metodologia.
In Polonia, l’occupazione standard (Contratto di lavoro) raggiunge abbastanza presto un tetto fiscale effettivo grazie ai massimali forfettari per la sanità e la previdenza sociale. Tuttavia, la vera divergenza avviene ai vertici: la classe medio-alta si sposta pesantemente verso strutture B2B a tariffa forfettaria, e gli ultra-ricchi utilizzano le strutture recentemente introdotte. Fondazione familiare polacca (Fondazione di famiglia). Questo veicolo consente di reinvestire i dividendi aziendali e le plusvalenze con un’aliquota fiscale immediata dello 0%, creando un enorme aumento "scogliera miliardaria."
Di conseguenza, la crescita di una vasta ricchezza economica rimane praticamente intatta da parte dello Stato, mentre le tasse sui consumi (IVA/accisa) e i contributi lineari sul lavoro estraggono oltre la metà del reddito economico del 10% più povero.
Le fonti complete e le limitazioni dei dati sono indicate nella parte inferiore del grafico.
https://i.redd.it/p85ea466f7eh1.jpeg
di Naprawmy_podatki
14 commenti
Its interesting that in the country you are citing (the US) everyone is saying billionaires pay no taxes and the system is a mess. So there is some question of, the intuitive calibration people have is off, because they always think billionaires don’t pay taxes.
If you look at Polish tax incentives, they are oriented around the idea of encouraging reinvestment. I think you first need to understand this, and why reinvestment is so important for economies with limited capital concentration, in the case of Poland, due to communism.
With that, there can be a discussion around what taxes SHOULD look like. In my view, taxes on productively reinvested capital should be low, because this is what generates national wealth and high paying jobs. You can look at the example of a state like Singapore. The important question to avoid the issues the US and Western Europe are facing, is how we can ensure that ordinary people save and invest enough of their income such that they benefit from the same rules.
So technically Denmark has exactly the same kind of vehicle. You can have a holding company to invest capital in, taxes are only levied upon payout.
just don’t be poor, ez solution to high taxes, it’s capitalism, everyone has equal opportunities /s (in some parts of the world this is how they unironically think, namely US and Canada)
Try living in England ! At least you guys paying tax for your country men and women!! Not every other nation in the world to come and live off you
The Polish Family Foundation is available to all citizens, and is just a deferment on tax.
How this is even counted? American billioners avoid having economical income, instead selling stocks which would create income they take loans against their assets which are not taxed. People like Musk don’t pay 20% of their actual income. Does this comparison take into account the loophole for poland (family fundation) and ignore the loophole for US?
I struggle to understand how the poorest pay more VAT tax compared to 2nd-4th decile.
All of these deciles probably spend all or almost all of their income. However the poorest are forced to mostly buy food which has lower tax rate (5%) than discretionary spending (most of the time 23%)
Well.. we also have the „borrowing” loophole. You can borrow the money, and that’s not taxed 🤦🏻
Cause bilionaires can pay zero, its game when if you push too much you win losing money
Being poor is expensive
Why should a billionaire pay more though, it’s a reward for just being better at accumulating wealth.
Wait until you find out about tax free retirement funds. Lmao populists strike again 😂
POPULISM
Wasn’t there a change few months back to curb this issue with family foundations but was vetoed and one of the people celebrating the most was Mentzen – member of family foundation?