
Gli Stati Uniti non hanno cambiato la loro politica riguardo agli attacchi con armi statunitensi in profondità nella Russia
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/the-us-has-not-changed-its-policy-regarding-strikes-with-us-weapons-deep-into-russia/
di Mil_in_ua
18 commenti
But have they changed their minds about Storm Shadow?
Which is definitely not going to be classed as “US weapons”
“representative of President Biden’s administration also told The Telegraph that Ukraine does not need to use Storm Shadow cruise missiles to strike Russian territory, as attack drones used by Ukrainian forces are already helping to destroy targets in Russia.”
So does that mean they have free reign to use Storm Shadow in the same places without the US getting involved?
Cowards
Because of the ITAR regulation, they can veto any decisions about equipment than contains at least one US component. Including british storm shadow, and french scalp missiles.
>“Ukraine has really been able to make a real impact using its own long-range UAV program,” the US official said.
“Official” being “Jake Sullivan’s mouthpiece”
Reverse engineer these bad boys you get from the west and make your own, then you can do what you want. I do not agree with giving weapons to a country then tell them how to use them in war, that is BS. But if you give them to me to use at your limited will, I will figure out how to make my own and use them at my will.
If we gift US Weapons to France, they become French Weapons
The anti-Americanism in this sub should be addressed, because at a glance you would think America has hurt more than it’s helped which is categorically false
Lift the restrictions on the UK and France first and come in later if that makes them feel ‘safer’ ……
They should do whatever means it takes to protect themselves from this all.
Define “deep” to me that’s over the Urals.
Joe Biden, you are a pussy.
Shoot them from Russia.
Big mistake. I hope Harris replaces Sullivan.
As an American veteran, I want Ukraine to do whatever they feel like they need to do to get the fascists out of their country. I do not respect or even acknowledge the sovereignty of Russia at this point. A state can’t engage in this much belligerence and bloodshed and still expect to be treated like a good faith actor.
Give ‘em hell. As far as I can tell, Ukraine is improving the quality of life for the Russians living in the territory they’re occupying which is much more than anyone could ever say about Russia and their unprovoked invasion.
Awful ally – awful.
I never thought I would see the day America would be chicken shit to Russia.
I just wanna say, I have zero sympathy for orcs high up on the chain who keep pushing the war. I wish Ukraine would be allowed to hit strategic targets with those HIMARS and other stuff coming in.
But have any of ya’ll watched those videos on modern nuke capability? Hiroshima and Nagasaki, up to 300,000 people in an instant. Today’s nukes, the ones that Russia has (even if they aren’t fully functional): 1 **million** in an instant. Russia has lost 600,000 over three *years*. That’s fucking scary. Life as we know it ceases to exist after the first nuke is launched. The ash and dust that’s throw into the air from one nuke will linger in the sky and block out the sun for years. If you don’t die from the first blast, you’ll either die of radioactive fallout, or hunger.
As a *sane* person, I would not want to be the one that made the call to allow deep strikes, provoking an already crazed lunatic into firing the first nuke.
Y’all, there are many, many reasons to not escalate. Government moves slowly on purpose. If Russia fires a nuke, the allies will be drawn into war. Sure, Russia will likely be crushed but at what cost? Stock markets tanking, innumerable lives lost, worldwide fear and uncertainty, bad actors moving forward while the allies are distracted, etc, etc.
It’s not as simple as handing over highly classified weapons = winning.
Would love to disrupt Russia railroads feeding the frontlines though…