
Traduzione TL;DR:
L’articolo "discute le politiche di asilo sempre più restrittive di Danimarca e Svezia, che hanno catturato l’attenzione dei politici tedeschi come potenziali modelli. La Danimarca, sotto il Primo Ministro Mette Frederiksen, mira a "zero richiedenti asilo," offrendo solo una protezione temporanea e incoraggiando i rifugiati a tornare a casa invece di integrarsi.
Il paese ha implementato misure severe come il confinamento dei richiedenti asilo nei campi, il taglio dei sussidi e il rendere più difficile il ricongiungimento familiare. Queste politiche, sebbene controverse, hanno ottenuto un ampio sostegno in Danimarca, dove sono considerate necessarie per preservare lo stato sociale. Anche la Svezia, che un tempo era una destinazione chiave per i rifugiati, si è spostata verso un approccio più restrittivo. Negli ultimi anni, più migranti hanno lasciato la Svezia di quanti ne siano arrivati, a causa di norme più severe sul ricongiungimento familiare, sussidi ridotti e controlli di frontiera più rigidi.
Il governo svedese sta adottando un approccio simile a quello danese, cercando di dissuadere i migranti dall’entrare nel paese. Mentre alcuni politici tedeschi vedono l’approccio scandinavo come un possibile modello, trasferire queste politiche alla Germania sarebbe difficile a causa delle differenze legali e politiche all’interno dell’UE.
https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/ausland/asylpolitik-schweden-daenemark-100.html
di SpookyMinimalist
10 commenti
So basically nothing.
I don’t know why I thought Germany had stricter immigration policies than us, but I did.
Recently I read that a Belarussian guy who participated in protests against the dictator and since then was ‘in search’ in Belarus was seeking asylum in Sweden, got rejected, appealed, rejected, was deported (or left himself) – and was arrested on the Belarussian border. So… yeah.. ‘tougher’… maybe dumber.
>Friedrich Merz, Markus Söder oder Sahra Wagenknecht
For once, good on them for copying a populist solution. But they are not really the driving voices required as they’re not in power. And from all I’ve seen thus far, the ruling coalition will not act on anything they have to say.
So at most, Autumn next year. Even then, the Conservatives are not exactly known for holding principles or recalling past promises.
Further,
>Markus Söder
does not belong anywhere but Bavaria. For any reason. Ever. I could live the rest of my existence without having any Bavarian politician involved in federal policy.
its about time
Was quite amusing to see Germany touting using the infrastructure paid for by the UK in its now abandoned Rwanda scheme.
The softlads over on ukpol literally didn’t know what to make of it.
Wow, these morons have zero ideas. Absolute zero.
Is germany poor now?
This will lead to the death of Schengen! The EU needs to formalise an immigration policy. Individual states cannot recklessly continue to make these decisions when it so impacts their neighbours.
Germany made that mistake in 2015… and it’s making it again!
The statement of more migrants have left Sweden then entered is not supported by the SCB(Central Bureau of Statistics. The SCB have told media that the change is because the tax office have cleared wrongly filed population registrations.
Source: https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/eMGj39/forvirringen-fler-invandrar-an-utvandrar-inte-tvartom