
La Germania non vuole più equipaggiamento militare dalla Svizzera – Una lettera dalla Germania sta facendo scalpore. Dice che le aziende svizzere sono escluse dalla richiesta di appalti alla Bundeswehr.
https://www.watson.ch/international/wirtschaft/254669912-deutschland-will-keine-ruestungsgueter-mehr-aus-der-schweiz
di ByGollie
20 commenti
Google translated from German
> #Germany no longer wants military equipment from Switzerland
>
> **A letter from Germany is making waves. It says that Swiss companies are excluded from applying for procurement from the Bundeswehr.**
>
> *10.09.2024, 22:31*
>
> The Bundeswehr does not want to buy multispectral camouflage equipment from Switzerland.
>
> A Swiss company wants to take part in a large German tender for 100,000 stationary multispectral camouflage equipment for the Bundeswehr. The catch: The company’s production facility must be located on EU territory, according to the tender.
>
> A mistake, the company thinks. The European Free Trade Association Efta with Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Iceland and Norway has probably been forgotten. It is addressed to the Federal Office for Equipment, Information Technology and Use of the Bundeswehr.
> Switzerland delivered the most war material to these countries in 2023 – 5 graphics
>
> This is where the disillusionment follows: the Efta states have by no means been forgotten. The decision was made consciously to have a production facility in the EU. There will be no deviation from this.
> Letter explains German “Lex Switzerland”
>
> A short time later, a letter from Germany to the Federal Office for Armaments Armasuisse, which “Le Temps” reported on, provided clarity. The Federal Office, which reports to the Federal Ministry of Defense, said that the aim of the procurement was to avoid an effect similar to that of ammunition for the Gepard anti-aircraft tank. A production facility in the Efta states was deliberately excluded. The multispectral camouflage equipment was one of the central technologies for the Bundeswehr. In addition, they must be able to be passed on to a partner country in the event of war.
> You want 50,000 francs? Then help find ideas for recovering ammunition from lakes
>
> In the letter, the German Federal Office referred to the squabble between Germany and Switzerland over 12,000 rounds for the Gepard anti-aircraft tank. Germany wanted to pass it on to Ukraine. It had been bought in Switzerland and needed the country’s blessing because of a non-re-export declaration. She said no for reasons of neutrality.
>
> The letter is proof that there is a “Lex Switzerland” in Germany: the country no longer buys defense products from Switzerland. Armaments chief Urs Loher put it drastically in “Le Temps”: “Switzerland is no longer trustworthy for Germany. In the German parliament, for example, ‘Swiss Free’ is apparently used in the same breath as ‘China Free’.”
>
> Parliament in the Netherlands has already decided not to buy any more military equipment from Switzerland. Similar considerations also exist in Denmark and Spain. It is not yet clear in the DDPS whether the German letter is a shot across the bow or just the beginning.
>
> Commoners blame themselves
>
> The situation is causing mutual blame among the bourgeois parties. “We are working to definitely destroy the Swiss arms industry,” says FDP President Thierry Burkart. The left has been working towards this for decades by tightening the War Materials Act. “The SVP is now its enforcer because by misinterpreting our neutrality it is preventing the transfer of arms from European states to Ukraine.”
>
> Burkart submitted a motion in 2022 in which he demanded that a non-re-export declaration could be dispensed with entirely if the delivery was made to countries that are committed to our values. “It has nothing to do with neutrality if other countries want to support each other with weapons that they bought in Switzerland years ago.”
> Switzerland wants to develop attack drones – the reasons and stumbling blocks
>
> The SVP passes the hot potato to the center. “The damage was caused by the tightening of the War Materials Act,” says President Marcel Dettling. “The center is to blame for this with their huffing and puffing: they tightened the law with the left, but wanted to go back after the war broke out.” Without tightening the regulations, export authority would have remained with the Federal Council. “This policy lacks longevity.”
>
> The SVP was against tightening the law, but then did not want to make an exception for Ukraine because it was not prepared to deliver to war zones. “We are now offering to ensure that countries that have purchased military equipment in Switzerland are allowed to export them again after a period of five years.”
>
> The center holds the government accountable. “The Federal Council can, on its own initiative, authorize the export of weapons purchased in Switzerland to other countries, based on Articles 184 and 185 of the Federal Constitution,” says President Gerhard Pfister. “The general tightening of the arms export law still allows this. But the SVP-FDP Federal Council doesn’t want to do that.” And Parliament has not yet managed to find a solution that can win a majority.
>
> Pfister counters the SVP accusation with a counter question: “Why is she now resisting the delivery of protective vests for reasons of neutrality, but wants to allow the re-export of weapons?”
>
> The Swiss company now wants to produce in an EU country. (aargauerzeitung.ch/lyn)
Gepard ammo realy pissed the germans
Yeah sounds about right, The exact issue they had with swiss made things in the past, and switzerland wanting to control how it is used or passed on later on is coming back to bite them in the face.
What’s tldr?
Good. That’s what happens when you don’t allow reexport of ammunition by hiding behind the veil of neutrality
Swiss weapons and ammo are factually useless outside of training.
Funniest thing is, that Gepard ammo is highly unlikely to kill anyone.
Good
That was expected 😁
Good. There should be a price for neutrality.
Good to see that Switzerland has now entered the find-out phase.
Should be a standard policy among EU countries.
Good. Fuck your dictator-supporting „neutrality“, Switzerland!
Haha, d’Düütsche sötted wägg!
Switzerland – play stupid games, win stupid prizes
Is Germany finally growing a pair? Man the Russian invasion of Ukraine did something to em I’m telling ya
Now that’s a W for Germany.
Totally reasonable.
If the Swiss are delusional enough to think that defending yourself against an aggressor according to international law is not neutral enough, they can go shove it.
Fuck Switzerland and their Nazi and Russian gold.
Their “neutrality” is just a guise to exploit both sides of every conflict.
Hit the Swiss where it’s always hurt them: *in their blood-stained wallets.* Not even selling all of the Ragusa chocloates in the world can make up for their lost arms sales.
After the Swiss’ flapped their arms about over their oh-so-precious neutrality by blocking the transfer of Rheinmetall’s AAA Gepard ammunition (i.e. *defensive* weaponry) to the Ukrainians and then blocking the sale of non-operational Leopard Is to Germany, this policy is totally rational on the part of the Germans.
To emphasize the point, the Ukrainians ought to de-prioritize Swiss efforts to help in the post-war reconstruction to prevent the Swiss from trying to buy their way back into everyone else’s good books.
As it stands, the Ukrainians have plenty of money and goodwill from the civilized world already lined up for reconstruction and de-mining after the shooting stops so any Swiss contribution would be a drop in the bucket.
The real elephant in the room is whether the Ukrainians and the rest of world will be trying to reconstruct and de-mine a reconstituted Ukraine per a peace treaty on Ukrainian terms or just a rump state and permanently depopulated Ukraine per a “peace treaty” on the Russians’ terms.