Close Menu
    Europa

    La Polonia intende accelerare l’uscita dal carbone, in modo che entro il 2040 la quota di carbone nel mix elettrico scenda all’1%.

    Share.
    View 30 Comments

    30 commenti

    2. Straight_Ad2258 on

      hope that Poland’s coal producing regions will get enough investment to weather the decline in coal jobs

      IIRC Poland has like 40% of remaining coal jobs in EU

    4. Timauris on

      If they achieve this, it would be monumental.

      I expected a much higher share of nuclear in the final stage though.

    5. Weak-Argument-1693 on

      That plan is just one PiS-government away from not happening at all. 

    6. outrider101 on

      We all know nuclear is going to be at 0% in 2040, our useless governments are eternally stuck in plannig phase…

    7. encelado748 on

      This plan looks surprisingly good and rational. Lot of renewable, nuclear as baseload, natural gas and storage for fast load following. It will never be implemented.

    8. ptok_ on

      Ach, Climate Ministry. It have very little to say about transformation, as they are not responsible for its implementation and funding and it’s currently occupied by lefties. It’s basically wishful thinking. I don’t think we even have enough capacity for that much renewables.

    10. Knuddelbearli on

      unfortunately, there will definitely be no nuclear power in poland by 2040, so it will probably be replaced by coal …

    12. nazgut on

      this is some new level of stupidity if you believe in it. Even if they close the power plants, coal will continue to be mined and its sale will go to China, that is, apart from losing a source of electricity (cheap development) nothing will change in the whole CO2

    13. umotex12 on

      Cool, but more nuclear! Craving for reactors is something that ascends all barriers currently. Your liberal family is arguing with PiS uncles? Tell them about need for nuclear, they will shake hands in no time. Even Konfederancja wants nuclear power.

    14. RelevantTrouble on

      Multiple nuclear plants in 15 years? Bless their hearts.

    16. rtfcandlearntherules on

      Is it even the slightest bit likely or even possible that this will be implemented? Without knowing anything – I assume it’s literally impossible to implement?

    17. LivingroomEngineer on

      I wish more people understood that renewables are not just about environment but also independence and security.
      If we can generate the energy ourselves, on our territory then we won’t have to worry if someone decides to turn off the gas tap for us (we all know who).
      We would also be secured from oil price fluctuations and extra inflation they cause.

    19. Vip_year_doll_eye on

      I’ll believe it when I see it, but I’m more interested in accelerating the modernization of heating sources.

    20. Hutcho12 on

      Good to see they’re adding nuclear. They can export some of the electricity to Germany after they foolishly shut it all down.

    21. kakao_w_proszku on

      Fingers crossed but between this and the record military spending I’m a bit afraid how we’re going to find money for all of this

    22. gaggzi on

      20%-ish nuclear in 15 years, well that’s optimistic to say the least, and I’m saying that as a huge proponent of nuclear energy.

    24. Kagmajn on

      Yeah, sure, we have some of the most expensive energy in the EU, and our loans are also the most expensive, while our salaries are really, really low. Good luck with the economy if we rely on just 1% coal as fuel. Also, our government loves (or used to love) giving 13th, 14th, and 15th salaries to coal miners. This is a good source of extra money for politicians, so it’s likely to drag on past 2040.

    25. edparadox on

      I mean, it’s easy when you have the biggest coal plant in Europe (or the world? I cannot remember).

    28. dat_9600gt_user on

      I see growth in the gas sector for 2030. That tells me they’re planning to use gas as a helper for transitioning.

    29. Mateking on

      Well quite optimistic that those nuclear capabilities will be online by 2040. I mean atleast they aren’t building EPR2 so maybe they can be on Track. Still that would be a novelty in Nuclear Power plant construction.

      Given that I don’t think 1% is happening with this plan. 20-25% is more likely. Which just sounds so much worse. But then again it doesnt really make sense to install more different power generation capacity when you are already committed to a decades long nuclear power plant construction.

    30. Intelligent-Soil-257 on

      Smart. Those coal plants would be the first infrastructure targets for ruskis, just like our stations, and double smart to have some nuclear power generated, for now ruskis are afraid of hitting nuclear plants directly

    Leave A Reply