Share.

    28 commenti

    1. NorthernBC_dude on

      According to the article in the WSJ, this guys’ strategy is actually on-point. He wants to keep supplying Ukraine to ensure Russia doesn’t gain any more territory and find a negotiated settlement that allows Ukraine to avoid being attacked again.

      This is honestly a better approach than the Biden approach of slowly letting Ukraine lose. At this point, the reality is Ukraine will be in a worse point for negotiation the longer the war goes on.

    2. jwyn3150 on

      ‘In the spring 2024, Kellogg became one of the authors of a plan to resolve the war in Ukraine, published by the America First Policy Institute.

      According to this plan, Trump could cut off military aid to Ukraine if it refuses to engage in peace talks.

      In turn, Moscow will be warned that any refusal to negotiate will lead to increased support for Ukraine’s army.

      The peace talks themselves should lead to a de facto freeze on the contact line.

      To push Russia to participate in the negotiations, the United States and other NATO countries would postpone the question of Ukraine’s membership for a long time in exchange for a “broad agreement with security guarantees.”’

      So basically what everyone already thought the plan would be.

    3. killroy1971 on

      Russian security guarantees? Only Trump would be arrogant enough to think Russia would honor those guarantees. So long as he’d not in office when Russia ignores those guarantees and invades for a third time he could blame whomever is in office and argue that his solution was “prefect” or “flawless.”

      No, the way forward is to give Ukraine everything it needs to close its airspace, interdict Russian supply lines, push the Russian air force back far enough to prevent the use of glide bombs, destroy the physical links between Russia and Ukraine, and turn out the lights in Moscow and St Petersburg for most of the year. The damage to Putin’s reputation will either lead to his downfall, or get him to the negotiating table. Hold the talks at the Hague.

      Sadly, Trump is a Putin fanboy. He’ll want to give Russia a victory of some kind and that plan has already been pushed by his campaign: surrender and appeasement.

      Yes Biden is way too much of an institutionalist, and I think his memory of the Soviet Union is behind his slow roll of Ukrainian support. This was one of his biggest foreign policy mistakes. When you fight a war, you want it to be end quickly not let it drag out for years hoping the enemy runs out of equipment, arms, and personnel.

    4. Away-Lynx8702 on

      He’s an 80 year old man. Can he stay awake/focused for 20 hour/day, everyday? No.

      Basically, allies will have to wait for him to wake up from his nap to talk.

    5. I’m having a hard time mustering up one positive thing about this guy. It looks like he doesn’t have any of the same goals as President Zelenskyy, next…

    6. JigglymoobsMWO on

      Notice Biden is already setting up Trump to win by letting Ukraine use long range strikes in Russia and teeing up supplemental funding.  When Trump comes in, he gets to play good cop.

      Remarkable how much Biden has helped trump since the debate. It’s almost a buddy movie.

    7. vanalden on

      Appeasement = encouragement.

      It doesn’t work. It won’t work. Can’t Trump see that?

    8. Toadfinger on

      Everything is pointing towards Ukraine as a launching point for Putin, Trump, and Un, to rob & plunder Europe.

    9. OnundTreefoot on

      Who the f*** would want us as an ally now? Our president loves our enemies and treats our allies like dirt.

    10. ZzangmanCometh on

      Any agreement with Russia worth less than the ~~toilet paper~~ roubles it’s written on…

    11. mookiewilson369 on

      Seriously question: Can Ukraine fight Russia at the same level they are if they only have support from European countries?

    12. wabashcanonball on

      Why would Europe ever agree to this? It only emboldens Russia.

    13. jbombdotcom on

      I’m fine with giving Ukraine back their nukes. 200 W80s and a deliver system should be a fine deterrent. Sorry my countrymen failed you.

    14. abitStoic on

      What we know about Kellog’s views on Ukraine:

      Kellog wrote the closest thing we have to a proposal for how a Trump admin will deal with Ukraine and Russia. I wrote about it a while ago here: [https://www.reddit.com/r/ActionForUkraine/comments/1dohrw2/trump_handed_plan_to_halt_us_military_aid_to_kyiv/la9sz3i](https://www.reddit.com/r/ActionForUkraine/comments/1dohrw2/trump_handed_plan_to_halt_us_military_aid_to_kyiv/la9sz3i)

      He wrote another policy paper about Ukraine with John Ratcliffe, the upcoming CIA Director: [https://www.reddit.com/r/ActionForUkraine/comments/1gpyvxt/trump_to_name_john_ratcliffe_as_cia_director/](https://www.reddit.com/r/ActionForUkraine/comments/1gpyvxt/trump_to_name_john_ratcliffe_as_cia_director/)

      There was also an insightful [interview ](https://www.voanews.com/a/former-trump-nsc-official-explains-his-vision-for-ending-war-in-ukraine-/7712184.html)with him here describing his vision for ending the war and criticism of Biden’s approach, and another one [here](https://x.com/generalkellogg/status/1860030803314639031) where he debunked Putin’s nuclear fear-mongering to Fox news and supported letting Ukraine strike Russia with ATACMS and says it should have been done a long time ago.

      On one hand, he wants peace negotiations and has a negotiating position that I consider weak (freezing current lines, no support for Ukraine in NATO). On the other, he has been vocal about wanting Ukraine in a strong position with more weapons, and that the Biden admin has insufficiently supported Ukraine.

    15. rainbow_killah on

      The orange idiot only wants attention, media needs to boycott this mess

    16. Fargrist on

      Ignore everything American. They are unreliable. Do what needs doing, and keep on doing it.

    17. FaithlessnessKind508 on

      Trump threatening to cut off funding is pointless. He is going to cut off funding no matter what. Zelensky should focus his time on lobbying other NATO nations and ignore trump.

    18. ProphetOfPr0fit on

      Any ceasefire without the promise of NATO membership is self-destructive. Ukraine is already a prime example of why you never, ever give up your nukes.

    19. SomeoneRandom007 on

      Countries like Spain will continue to consider themselves buffered by NATO.

    20. F Russia at this point. Btw what is Ukraine position on Crimea? Must have or negotiations?

    21. Drunk_on_Swagger on

      So Ruzzia will randomly push for all the land grab they can get before 1/20ish at all costs.

    22. earthforce_1 on

      Everyone says they want peace, (even Hitler did) but the question is peace on who’s terms? So they agree to talk and they are (naturally) a light year apart on terms. What then?

    23. Key-Lie-364 on

      The presumption of Donald Trump to demand Ukraine gives up 20% of its territory.

      And the misreading of Putin’s intentions and Putin’s psychological ability at this point to – in effect – capitulate to American threats is unbelievable.

      “Big man” Putin – can hardly accept bending the knee to the US at this point, no matter who is President.

      This is a war of attrition and we are some way yet from a train wagon in Southern France..

    24. Key-Lie-364 on

      In all seriousness – is this position any worse than Jake Sullivan’s “escalation containment” ?

      It has the virtue of saying out loud what we suspected about Sullivan’s position all along.

      You think if Putin signaled before the US election that freezing of the lines of contact was on the cards that Sullivan and those who think like him wouldn’t have recommended it ?

      A few rounds of fits and starts, Kellog mugged by reality, let’s see what tune Kellog is singing because, in here is the US threat to up the ante.

      Go. Right. Ahead.

      About time too.

    Leave A Reply