No, le FFS non sono la seconda migliore compagnia ferroviaria d’Europa ma l’undicesima. Lo studio dell’ONG “Trasporti&Ambiente” aveva erroneamente utilizzato i prezzi indicati di default dalle FFS con l’abbonamento metà-prezzo. Questo è importante perché il prezzo del biglietto rappresenta il 25% della valutazione totale.
https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/pricey-tickets-poor-service-rail-ranking-exposes-the-best-and-worst-in-europe
di SaPpHiReFlAmEs99
6 commenti
Now it is behind SNCF, the Spanish, Swedish and Austrians railways
Rather expensive and actually reliable than cheap and unusable. E.g. you cannot use DB to commute at all. It’s not reliable.
Who care about a random ranking from a random ONG.
What a stupid ranking. SBB is the 2nd best and most reliable public transport system in the whole world. Of course it will be more expensive. If you want cheap, go to Kenia.
This study kind of highlights how hard it is to perform such studies. Their scores are partially based on odd metrics and price accounting for 40% of the score while reliability only counts towards 15% is a very questionable decision. Also they didn’t include frequency and coverage, which, in my opinion, are some quite critical aspects of railways.
To be fair, does anyone who isn’t a tourist ride the train without Halbtax or a GA? Halbtax pays for itself after two longer distance rides.