Well done to the survivor who took the case and to his ex-partners who wouldn’t let his solicitors/barristers portray him falsely.
[deleted] on
[removed]
Lordderak on
Wow what a degenerate prick of a man
calex80 on
Wow, can’t recall ever hearing someone contradict a character reference in court.
Tony Hunt not happy with the defence and rightly refused to suspend any of the sentence.
BeanEireannach on
>At the outset of the case this morning, Mr Justice Tony Hunt was told that a number of testimonials had been submitted to court at the sentence hearing last month in which Mooney had been described by relatives and friends as “family oriented” and “always striving to provide for his children” who would “miss him dearly”.
>He was also described as “idolising” and “adoring” his children and “striving for nothing but the best” for them.
Given how clearly that was contradicted by the mothers of 4 of his 5 children, do people like those relatives and friends get in trouble for submitting false information in the testimonials to the court?
Fair play to those two former partners for coming forward to contradict the BS. And I hope the woman in this case gets some semblance of relief now that it’s over. Great too that Mr Justice Tony Hunt declined to suspend any of the sentence.
Fast_Ingenuity390 on
Why haven’t the people who perjured themselves by giving fraudulent character witness evidence been prosecuted yet?
We could also do with the Defence Forces confirming quite urgently if those witnesses are members of the Defence Forces.
GoogolX90 on
Why are the defence able to fabricate his character. Surely they should be responsible for doing so?
asdrunkasdrunkcanbe on
Prime example for why character witness statements are archaic nonsense and shouldn’t ever be accepted by courts. Crime is a crime regardless of the character who did it.
Everyone will say their friends and family are great. Character statements are meaningless shite.
Lazy-Economics-3565 on
I know you can never judge a book and all that… But he really does look like a horrible cunt. There’s nothing but malice behind those eyes.
yetindeed on
Sociopath. He’s gonna be a problem until the day he dies.
Ok-Kaleidoscope1866 on
After the piece of shit was convicted, his barrister had the fucking nerve to say his client wasn’t a bad person.
He’s a convicted rapist who has 4 children he couldn’t care less about – what fucking planet is he on for chrissakes
12 commenti
5 kids at 30 sounds like an ad for a vasectomy
Well done to the survivor who took the case and to his ex-partners who wouldn’t let his solicitors/barristers portray him falsely.
[removed]
Wow what a degenerate prick of a man
Wow, can’t recall ever hearing someone contradict a character reference in court.
Tony Hunt not happy with the defence and rightly refused to suspend any of the sentence.
>At the outset of the case this morning, Mr Justice Tony Hunt was told that a number of testimonials had been submitted to court at the sentence hearing last month in which Mooney had been described by relatives and friends as “family oriented” and “always striving to provide for his children” who would “miss him dearly”.
>He was also described as “idolising” and “adoring” his children and “striving for nothing but the best” for them.
Given how clearly that was contradicted by the mothers of 4 of his 5 children, do people like those relatives and friends get in trouble for submitting false information in the testimonials to the court?
Fair play to those two former partners for coming forward to contradict the BS. And I hope the woman in this case gets some semblance of relief now that it’s over. Great too that Mr Justice Tony Hunt declined to suspend any of the sentence.
Why haven’t the people who perjured themselves by giving fraudulent character witness evidence been prosecuted yet?
We could also do with the Defence Forces confirming quite urgently if those witnesses are members of the Defence Forces.
Why are the defence able to fabricate his character. Surely they should be responsible for doing so?
Prime example for why character witness statements are archaic nonsense and shouldn’t ever be accepted by courts. Crime is a crime regardless of the character who did it.
Everyone will say their friends and family are great. Character statements are meaningless shite.
I know you can never judge a book and all that… But he really does look like a horrible cunt. There’s nothing but malice behind those eyes.
Sociopath. He’s gonna be a problem until the day he dies.
After the piece of shit was convicted, his barrister had the fucking nerve to say his client wasn’t a bad person.
He’s a convicted rapist who has 4 children he couldn’t care less about – what fucking planet is he on for chrissakes