Share.

    29 commenti

    1. Nebuladiver on

      These are always poor comparisons. There are different costs associated with them (from their duties or even country / population sizes). And their existence also brings different revenue to the countries.

    2. Frenk5080 on

      The author couldn’t remember the name of the country the Dutch live in.

    3. BasileusBasil on

      TBH these spendings are ludicrously low compared to how much some enterpreneurs spend and how much they evade in taxes.

    4. And how much do they generate?

      Edit – Downvotes are lame. What’s the problem with the question?

    5. olli1936 on

      Hey those countries are so happy with their monarchy. This is the reason why they keep and feed it. I can’t blame them at all though I am not a monarchist and I am happily living in a country without a king or queen.

    6. Sad-Attempt6263 on

      😐 after what Andrew did in the last 5 years I wouldn’t want that family representing the UK with a 10 ft barge pole 

    7. Randver_Silvertongue on

      It’s even more expensive to have presidents. And each citizen of the UK only spends £2 a month to maintain the monarchy. And the Crown Estate gives back more money to the government.

    8. nim_opet on

      Monaco spending looks a little out of whack. I wonder if the finances of the state and the house of Grimaldi are commingled somehow

    9. Ill-Back-9149 on

      The 9 million for the Spanish crown are not real. Many many expenses are assigned to other offices, with the clear intention to make up the figures.

    10. SquashLeather4789 on

      Spanish guy is cheap. No wonder he gets entangled in scandals regularly.

    11. Monarchy isn’t just a matter of money. It also serves to entrench the mindset of ‘I’m better than you by virtue of birth’. It’s fundamentally unfair. Like religious belief or the desire for strongman’s leadership, it belongs in the infancy of our species, and I hope we will one day move on.

    12. DonQuigleone on

      Something to bear in mind here is that these countries vary dramatically by size.

      The UK is by far the biggest with only the Netherlands having a similar number of people.

      It’s better to adjust these relative to population, in which case the most absurd monarchy here is Monaco. It’s only 36,000 people, which means Monaco spends 1200 euro per person on it’s monarchy, while the UK spends just over 2 euro per person on the monarchy. 2 euro per person is not exactly a grievously expensive cost.

      There are legitimate reasons to abolish the monarchy, but I don’t think cost is really one of them.

    13. naplesball on

      UK: They don’t have enough money for immigrant facilities, efficient public transport, efficient public healthcare etc…but they have €147 Millions for an incestuous family

    14. FitztheBlue on

      Country,Total Annual Cost,Cost per Capita
      Netherlands,€41.4 million,€2.40
      Belgium,€11.6 million,€1.04
      Denmark,€10.6 million,€1.84
      Norway,€29 million,€5.80
      Sweden,€13.2 million,€1.30
      Spain,€7.8 million,€0.17
      Luxembourg,€10 million,€17.00
      United Kingdom,£89.1 million (€105.9 million),€1.58
      Monaco,€36.6 million,€938.46

    15. Travel-Barry on

      Not really a relevant comparison when you consider we had a funeral and coronation in the same tax year. I’d expect our figure to be high, but this needs to account for 2023 being an unusual year.

    16. TheSecondTraitor on

      More or less comparable with our presidential palace that has 11.7 million € budget. All the properties, palaces, castles and whatever else the monarchs have to manage from the budget have to be factored in as well.

    17. foundalltheworms on

      Dreaming of the days UK no longer has the monarchy ✨

    18. Cypriot_scholar on

      Drop on the ocean for UK gov spending. NHS spends that amount in a day

    19. Pleasethelions on

      For Denmark, the royal house almost definitely brings huge profits. Rather than an anonymous president that changes every for years, the King travels the world as a cultural phenomenon with great PR value, often with business delegations, to promote Denmark and Danish business.

      For a country where half our GDP is dependent on exports, this is tremendous PR.

      I couldn’t personally be less interested in the royal family but I’m definitely a supporter – just for financial reasons.

      It is, of course, difficult to measure. But what this doesn’t not take into account is also the expenses of having a president for head of state rather than a king/queen.

    20. JetlinerDiner on

      It’s not only the Dutch people, it’s all the people that pay taxes here even though he’s not their king.

    21. IamIchbin on

      The last absolute monarchy in europe is missing. The king of the vatican.

    22. LifeSucks1988 on

      Still find it silly that some naturalization tests require to swear loyalty to the Crown even if you are not applying for a job in government….but alas 🤷🏽‍♂️

    23. RECTUSANALUS on

      The British crown is estimated to bring in 2billion In tourism

    Leave A Reply