Share.

    12 commenti

    1. Civil-Shame-2399 on

      Just about the highest in Europe already but don’t let that stand in the way….

    2. Future_Ad_8231 on

      ESB one of the few companies i wouldn’t question regarding this. Incredibly well run and incredibly good at their job. If they need more funding to maintain this level of service, it’s still good value

    3. Alastor001 on

      Oh, but what about Act of God event?

      If you don’t compensate, fair enough. But you can’t then increase the price. It’s like… Having cake and eating it?

    4. As an urban dweller I am not very happy to have pay extra because other people choose to live in isolated one off houses in the countryside. Those who choose to live in one off housing are responsible for a lot of extra cost and by right they should be the ones paying for it.

    5. slevinonion on

      God forbid they use their massive profits from last few years. They reduced their annual tree cutting schedule aswell. This is 100% on them.

    6. Marzipan_civil on

      Are ESB networks entirely privately funded? Can they not get funding from government to repair the network after storms

    7. Drvonfrightmarestein on

      I dunno whether to upvote this so it gets seen or downvote it to show my disapproval of the ESB here.

    8. YoIronFistBro on

      Kicking people down when they’re already at their lowest. Well done ESB…

    9. RecycledPanOil on

      This is not how this should work at all. The ESB should eat the cost not the consumer. This is the risk they take as a company. It paid off for the last decade.

    10. bobbyperu1971 on

      If you choose to live on an acre in rugged beautiful Mayo you should be expected to burden the cost when stuff goes wrong. Unfair that people living crammed on top of each other in cities have to pay for the solitude of the few

    Leave A Reply