Share.

    20 commenti

    1. Intelligent_Box3479 on

      Kind of wild we still don’t have a place in the world to just dump people like this. I’d love to hear an argument against that.

    2. “She said after her friend left things got “hazy and faded”, adding that she believed she had been drugged.

      The jury heard toxicology tests showed only alcohol and cocaine in her system and did not detect any so-called rape drugs.”

      That old chestnut again.

    3. Alastor001 on

      They say don’t judge book by its cover, but…

      Why do they always look exactly how one would imagine?

    4. Potential-Drama-7455 on

      Can’t believe on that evidence that someone on the jury thought they were innocent.

    5. Ok_Magazine_3383 on

      > During a 30-second clip taken in the car, a woman’s voice could be heard a number of times saying: “No.”

      > A WhatsApp exchange later showed one of the men sending the video and another saying: “Listen to you laughing after she says no.”

      File under “things men who will be convicted of rape say”.

    6. asdrunkasdrunkcanbe on

      Video evidence of it, fucking hell.

      I’m kind of shocked that the jury was 11-1 on this. What else did that last person need?

      If you read the article, even their own defence solicitors basically said, “I’m not claiming my client is definitely innocent, I’m just telling you that the evidence the state has is not strong enough”.

      Which, in theory, is exactly all a defence should have to do, but they usually deny the charges vehemently.

    7. INXS2021 on

      There goes his career as a personal rapist…I mean trainer.

    8. smooth_capybara on

      Didn’t two of these guys used to work in a specific gym that closed down a couple of years ago? Wonder if this was part of the reason why

      Not like a couple of roiders to be absolute dickheads overcompensating for their huge (or should I say tiny) insecurities

      Edit: Any PTs constantly touching women should be a huge, huge red flag

    9. Busy-Rule-6049 on

      Hate that shit from defence lawyers, oh you were dancing in a provocative way. I understand they have to provide a defence but they should be told to cop on.
      Remember reading another time a rape victim had a pink thong on and that was used as well.

      Hope they go all American History X on them in prison

    10. sureyouknowurself on

      > During a 30-second clip taken in the car, a woman’s voice could be heard a number of times saying: “No.”

      Throw away the key.

    11. S_lyc0persicum on

      2019. This poor woman has had this court case hanging over her head for 6 years

    12. sweetpiano24601 on

      The phrase “locker room talk” makes me shudder now. Always used to excuse the most disgusting crap. This kind of shit isn’t normal and should never be normalised.

    13. Internal-Spinach-757 on

      This is a quote from the defence barrister describing some dancing in CCTV from the nightclub

      “If they didn’t have their clothing on you could say they were virtually having sex,” Also described her dancing as in a “highly sexualised” way.

      How the fuck can a Judge allow this shit in a court of law? Barrister should be up on professional misconduct for this kind argument. Delighted these scum got convicted but defence barrister and the Judge should be ashamed of themselves.

    14. Rogue7559 on

      “During a 30-second clip taken in the car, a woman’s voice could be heard a number of times saying: “No.”

      A WhatsApp exchange later showed one of the men sending the video and another saying: “Listen to you laughing after she says no.”

      And yet 1 out of the 12 person jury voted not guilty. FFS

    15. Personal Trainer has to be one of the most rapey professions going.

    Leave A Reply