L’Irlanda sta registrando una definizione di antisemitismo che è stato usato contro i politici irlandesi
https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2025/02/05/ireland-is-signing-up-to-a-definition-of-anti-semitism-that-has-been-used-against-irish-politicians/
di Shiv788
15 commenti
Of course it is, you’ll also notice we’re no longer on course for the israeli goods ban. Because ff and fg are both conservative parties
What do the Americans/ Israeli intelligence have over Martin and co? Their support for Israel and Zionism is baffling or is it purely financial.
[removed]
Disgraceful but expected. The way the US holds sway over so much of the world is not great. Soft power seems much more effective than troops on the ground.
Between outright lies about housing,openly wanting to conscript people into NATO wars,rolling back on banning occupied territories act and now this.
We have probably the worst government in history of the state these past few years
i once commented on this sub that the british empire in ireland has been replaced by the american empire and everyone told me i was being dramatic
For what died the sons of Roisin
The US is redefining what antisemitism is, the UK redefining what Islamophobia is. We’re stuck in the middle of it with a government who’ll kowtow to avoid a spanking.
I clicked the link and read the IHRA definition of antisemitism and perhaps I missed something but it seems perfectly compatible with objections to the actions of the state of Israel…? You just can’t say ‘Israel shouldn’t exist’, which was never the position of the Irish government.
The definition being signed up to is:
> Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.
Which is fine. There’s no problem with signing up to it, and doing so shows that we are not, in fact, being anti-semitic when we criticise Israel. And, honestly, it doesn’t matter what the definition is because Israelis are going to accuse us of being antisemitic anyway.
So definitions are evolving? So genocide can evolve too?
Is the occupied territory bill dead?
So everything that anyone with a brain said before the election was true then. Watch FFG cruise through the next election based on a pack of lies as well.
The problem with the definition is when one side unilaterally determines what constitutes Jewish property.
You have a current Israeli government who believe that manifest destiny provides a basis for land outside their sovereign borders to be Jewish property.
Therefore, criticisms of conflict in Palestine or the West Bank are anti-Semitic.
As would be the UN recognised 1967 borders of Israel.
Which is of course lunacy.
Big Jim Larkin would be swivelling in his grave and,
if he could , would cry,
” Where’s the Risen People ? “