Non so se qualcuno di voi abbia letto la “lettera aperta” che il partito verde ha scritto in risposta al discorso di JD Vance a Monaco. Amalo o odialo le false dichiarazioni dei Verdi sono così evidenti che non capisco come siano arrivati.
Quando nel mondo Vance ha detto che la protezione contro il razzismo e l’antisemitismo scomparirà?
O perché dovrebbero dire che un sostegno alla libertà di parola e rispetto delle elezioni democratiche è una notizia falsa?
Non cercando di proteggere JD Vance qui, più come chiamare la grave rappresentazione di qualcosa con quelli che possono essere solo ulteriori motivi dai Verdi.
In una certa misura penso che sia sul marchio per i Verdi, soprattutto vedendo come il diritto ha guadagnato popolarità in Europa, devono sentirsi attaccati. Ma perché ricorrere alla disinformazione? Puoi chiamare il fatto che non supporterai qualcuno ma rimani nella realtà per favore.
Sono impazziti? Hanno anche guardato l’intero video prima di scrivere la loro lettera?
(Il mio tedesco è abbastanza bravo da leggere la lettera ma non per discutere della politica. Per favore, abbi pazienza con il mio inglese 😁)
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1ittond
di pl-rk
12 commenti
You have to read between the lines.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/18/vance-speech-munich-full-text-read-transcript-europe/
Ehm… it’s called “subtext”. J.D. said X, but what he really meant is Y.
Yes officer over here. I found the fascist sympathizer.
Do actually know what he said? That hypocritic arrogant asshole basically said Europeans all live in authoritarianism. While the Trump administration is in the process dismantling all checks and balances on power.
That’s like if Hitler gave a speech and critiqued that Americans put japanese Americans in internment camps.
Grow up, OP, and learn to understand subtext
Basically, the speech was about how Europeans should embrace the “American way” (well, his vision of it). The open letter is also about the fact that our current president commented the speech as being “very liberal, very Swiss in a certain way”. So the Greens are reminding how “liberal” is Mr Vance’s vision (and to understand it, you have to go a little beyond what is literally in the speech).
Subtext
The white house revoked access to press briefings from any journalist that refuses to call the gulf of mexico “gulf of america”.
Trumps advisor elon is banning anyone on x for being mean towards right wingers. All the while nazis are getting their accounts back and are allowed to spew their hatred unchecked.
If you don’t see how disingenious (or well, fake) jd vances statements are when it comes to free speech, you are literally BLIND
Also, jd said “wokeness” is the enemy of free speech, when the us is currently demonstrating that right wing pusies are the true enemies of free speech
It’s one of the reasons trump was elected, or the afd/svp is getting more and more support. It is because people listen to politicians and only hear the words, but not the meaning of those words.
Is this your first encounter with propaganda? A very dark agenda is propagated here by shifting the focus away from the real evil and painting the picture of an imaginary evil. And you fall for it hook line and sinker.
To the first point with the “Protection of racism and antisemitism”:
The US have a different understanding of “freedom of speech”. Basically you can say anything. In many European countries you can say anything as long as the freedom of others is not hurt. He brings a few examples (I will break down only one):
– Vance said:
>[…] ast October […] the Scottish government began distributing letters to citizens whose houses lay within so-called “safe access zones,” warning them that even private prayer within their own homes may amount to breaking the law.
This refers to a law which disallow people to protest in front of abortion clinics (in a radius of 200m). If you now protest on your own ground within this radius it’s still a crime. As many anti-abortionists are religious they could probably “pray” as a form of protest. This is also forbidden – as long as it’s visible/audible.
Source partly: [https://www.dw.com/de/ist-europas-freiheit-in-gefahr-dsa-digitale-dienste-unterdr%C3%BCckung/a-71660852](https://www.dw.com/de/ist-europas-freiheit-in-gefahr-dsa-digitale-dienste-unterdr%C3%BCckung/a-71660852)
In Switzerland it’s depending on the issue the same. You have the freedom of speech. But there are exceptions like for example the Diskriminierungsstrafnorm ( [https://www.ekr.admin.ch/rechtsgrundlagen/d184.html](https://www.ekr.admin.ch/rechtsgrundlagen/d184.html) ). So basically yes: If we’d follow the ideas Vance said in his speech, this protection wouldn’t be there.
The second point with the votingresults refers to Romania, which is a sensitive topic and it’s a topic I’m not informed enough to have a deeper knowing of it.
The media and others went crazy because US cut some of their funds. This means automatically the new US leadership is evil coming directly from hell.