Share.

    22 commenti

    1. Agitated-Airline6760 on

      So much more brave than certain someone with an “alleged” bone spur

    2. fiendishrabbit on

      It’s a bit weird that her tag says Alexandra. Isn’t Alexandra her middle-name? Ie, the tag should say “Glücksburg”?

    3. critiqueextension on

      Princess Ingrid Alexandra’s military service reflects a significant commitment, as she is serving as a gunner on the CV90 STING vehicle and has extended her initial training to 15 months, concluding in April 2025. This military engagement is a notable tradition among European royals, illustrating a trend of modern monarchy embracing military service as a rite of passage.

      * [Her Royal Highness Princess Ingrid Alexandra](https://www.royalcourt.no/artikkel.html?tid=28778&sek=28633)
      * [Royal House shares video of Princess in action after extending …](https://www.hola.com/us/royals/20241009723248/princess-ingrid-alexandra-norway-extends-military-service-action-packed-video/)

      ^(This is a bot made by [Critique AI](https://critique-labs.ai). If you want vetted information like this on all content you browse, [download our extension](https://critiquebrowser.app).)

    4. Annanymuss on

      Our heiress (spain) as well the 3 armies (currently in naval)

    5. I must say, that I think this is one of my favorite part about royalties and part why I dislike politicians. Sure, she will and as many other royals, most likely never be put in actual, real danger and if war would happened, she would most likely never serve, though as British Royal Family show, they actually may, to different level. Meanwhile, politicians? They will avoid voluntary, military service and then order people to die in wars, while not having to suffer even a single day in a boot camp, not to mention risking their own skin in a game, while preaching, that we are all in this together.

    6. Randalf_the_Black on

      It’s purely symbolic, she’ll never in a million years serve in a war zone no matter how bad things would get.

      She’d be evacuated out of the country if Norway was in danger of being occupied, as her capture and imprisonment would be a morale blow.

      Still, it’s a nice gesture that she wants to do her civic duty, it makes her more “approachable” and not quite as elevated above the people. “Folkelig” as one would say in Norwegian.

    7. 415erOnReddit on

      It’s INSANE to me that it’s 2025 and there are still monarchs.

    8. History20maker on

      Imagine your grandmother just telling you: “You know, when I was your age I went to the army with the fucking Queen”

    9. SoRedditHasAnAppNow on

      I once went for a walk in Oslo without a plan. I accidentally walked up to the front door of their castle.

      I’ve been in bigger “houses” in Canada.

    10. Salty_Round8799 on

      That’s ironic, my niece pretends to be a queen even though she will never actually rule. I guess pretending to be something you aren’t is just fun like that.

    11. WinstonFuzzybottom on

      I dislike the idea if royalty, but if I had to follow, I’d prefer royalty like this. Hell, I’d prefer royalty like this to what I have currently.

    12. Slim-Shadeee13 on

      Love this! This is just like Donald Trumps’s kids, right?! Oh wait…

    13. kaufmann_i_am_too on

      Meanwhile the orange guy form the US avoided the draft 5 times because he had connections.

    Leave A Reply