Ancora una volta il nostro costo di salute aumenterà …
Mi chiedo per quanto tempo le persone lo accetteranno. Sempre più persone non possono accedere alle cure mediche di base o non andare dal medico perché è troppo pesante con il loro budget … mentre il CEO di società sanitari guadagna centinaia di migliaia sulla nostra schiena e le grandi aziende farmaceutiche fanno miliardi di profitti …
La nostra salute non dovrebbe essere un’azienda ma un diritto per tutti.
https://i.redd.it/2nk33hi3eupe1.jpeg
di Karsa_1312
10 commenti
As long as the majority of voters believes that a unique health insurance institution is worst than the current system of private insurers
It’s not only healthcare, it’s also dental care not being included in LAMAL.
If you aren’t rich, or do not have the money to go on a “dental tourism” holiday, your teeth rot in Switzerland.
Doctors, Insurance companies and Dentists are scum at this point.
That’s for once a good thing. Old people have a 300 Franchise and go to the doctor all the time.
I don’t think I am in a bad position financially (i.e. not eligible for subsidies), but currently healthcare costs are roughly 25% of my net income. It’s actually the number one household expense, above rent (although thereabout equivalent) or groceries, and entierly eclipsing utilities or transportation.
That’s … insane.
+ This probably won’t even lower premiums and worst case could drive them up
Healthcare costs over 91 billion CHF per year in Switzerland. There are only 39 health insurance CEOs. They make maybe 0.02% all together. Why don’t you talk about the 99.98% of the cost?
Santo Luigi, ora pro nobis.
As long as people buy into the bs from the liberals or right wings. That’s how long.
Maybe it would be a good idea to change the system. Considering how many old people there are and how few young, the current system isn’t sustainable anymore
As long as people are scared of socialism
It’s basically a (if you don’t count the cost of the administrative overhead, IT changes necessary, etc.) zero sum game.
Basically the higher franchise *alone* should lower the premiums by 3%.
That this premium decrease will likely be “eaten up” by the yearly cost explosion – and the premiums will therefore *overall* likely still rise – due to higher demand, aging population, etc. is unfortunate, but not related to the change in franchise.