Quindi, ora che la piattaforma X ha violato alcune leggi digitali diffondendo la missinformazione, ecc. E l’UE sta pianificando di rafforzare X, la mia domanda è;
Come vengono multate le autorità quando usano X?
Ad esempio, Sisäministeriö, Traficom ecc. Perché usano la piattaforma illegale? Qual è la loro risposta? Perché non smettono di usarlo?
di Rich_Artist_8327
4 commenti
The platform is not illegal. It’s not illegal to use it.
Every single website on internet is spreading misinformation to a certain point. Do we highlight specifically twitter just because Musk have to do anything with it?
Why would users get fined when the problem is with the company who runs the platform? The fine is based on lack of moderation. You can give them feedback on their social media practices.
You are making a false dichotomy.
A platform/service/company does not become illegal to use because the **provider** breaks a law. Say a building firm does not folow law and procedures when building a skyscraper, does not mean no one should enter the building if it’s finished, nor does it mean the building should not be fixed (if a flaw has been introduced) instead of being demolished (except in extreme cases).
Or, say a pizza restaurant breaks the rights of it’s employees, does not make everyone responsible who have been at the restaurant (unless they knowingly support these activities).
Speaking in very broad terms – if it is known an entity (person or a company) is unreliable, corrupt or providing for unethical activities, then users might want to choose not to support this entity. It’s rarely thay black and white, however.
It has also been perfectly normal for companies getting fined over the years by EU and other countries, and said businesses still continuing activities (but at least hopefully adjusting their activities appropriately).
I’m kinda divided on whether government institutions should continue to use X. Having some sane sources of information can be also a good thing, otherwise it will be just another bubble.