WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican and Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee voiced sharp bipartisan criticism Tuesday about reports the Trump administration is eyeing a reduction of U.S. forces in Europe, saying America must stick with its NATO allies.
Rep. Michael Rogers, R-Mich., the panel’s chairman, said the U.S. must not cut troop levels in Europe and added that he was opposed to any plan for the U.S. to relinquish NATO command. The U.S. historically has held the Supreme Allied Command Europe, or SACEUR, position.
“U.S. leadership in NATO is essential to ensure armed American forces, including our nuclear weapons, always remain under U.S. command,” Rogers said at the start of a hearing with Army Gen. Christopher G. Cavoli, commander of U.S. European Command and the NATO commander.
Rep. Michael Turner, R-Ohio, added that “the idiocy of the fact that there was any discussion” about giving up the SACEUR role “is just beyond me.”
Cavoli told the committee that he has recommended the U.S. maintain its current force totals. There have been roughly 100,000 U.S. troops in Europe in recent years, a 20,000-troop increase since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
parkerDeborah3l8 on
Me thinky troops in Europe good!
WeirdKittens on
If they won’t help defend from Russia they have no business staying. Why would we want them here if they’re not going to help? To have a logistics base for their next war in the middle east that will flood Europe with more migrants? To make us a target for retaliation when they decide to go against China?
Nah, either sit here and help or GTFO. No third option.
VillagePatrick on
House democrats and republicans need to start putting two and two together on Trump and Putin.
sseumblue on
Finally, voices of reason. Though I doubt Trump would be willing to listen to any rational people stating sensible facts…
OkSituation181 on
Kind of tells us all how little of their being in Europe was even about Russia and how much was about control.
CRE178 on
Too late. We don’t want them anymore. Send them to Ukraine if you want them to stay in Europe.
edparadox on
Changing your mind already?
I guess Americans chose the “spectate” mode in the war with Russia, so they could say they never left the server.
ScootsMgGhee on
Meanwhile, Trump ponders bombing Mexico.
Notbadconsidering on
Why do we want them?
InCloud44 on
“Katherine Thompson, who is doing the job of assistant defense secretary for international affairs, repeatedly told lawmakers that there is an ongoing Pentagon review of troop totals and no decisions have been made. But, asked again two hours into the hearing whether the U.S. would give up the SACEUR job, she said, “**my definitive answer is no**.”
TapiocaFilling101 on
Europe could start with its own take on the Monroe doctrine:
Any intervention in the political affairs of Europe and the Mediterranean by foreign powers is a potentially hostile act against the
Responsible-Pain-620 on
That’s cute, they think he cares about their opinions.
NoctisScriptor on
Errrr no. Leave. Don’t return. Bye.
dustofdeath on
Once you take them out, you are out permanently.
You lost your presence in EU. You are not welcome to return later on a whim.
16 commenti
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican and Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee voiced sharp bipartisan criticism Tuesday about reports the Trump administration is eyeing a reduction of U.S. forces in Europe, saying America must stick with its NATO allies.
Rep. Michael Rogers, R-Mich., the panel’s chairman, said the U.S. must not cut troop levels in Europe and added that he was opposed to any plan for the U.S. to relinquish NATO command. The U.S. historically has held the Supreme Allied Command Europe, or SACEUR, position.
“U.S. leadership in NATO is essential to ensure armed American forces, including our nuclear weapons, always remain under U.S. command,” Rogers said at the start of a hearing with Army Gen. Christopher G. Cavoli, commander of U.S. European Command and the NATO commander.
Rep. Michael Turner, R-Ohio, added that “the idiocy of the fact that there was any discussion” about giving up the SACEUR role “is just beyond me.”
Cavoli told the committee that he has recommended the U.S. maintain its current force totals. There have been roughly 100,000 U.S. troops in Europe in recent years, a 20,000-troop increase since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
Me thinky troops in Europe good!
If they won’t help defend from Russia they have no business staying. Why would we want them here if they’re not going to help? To have a logistics base for their next war in the middle east that will flood Europe with more migrants? To make us a target for retaliation when they decide to go against China?
Nah, either sit here and help or GTFO. No third option.
House democrats and republicans need to start putting two and two together on Trump and Putin.
Finally, voices of reason. Though I doubt Trump would be willing to listen to any rational people stating sensible facts…
Kind of tells us all how little of their being in Europe was even about Russia and how much was about control.
Too late. We don’t want them anymore. Send them to Ukraine if you want them to stay in Europe.
Changing your mind already?
I guess Americans chose the “spectate” mode in the war with Russia, so they could say they never left the server.
Meanwhile, Trump ponders bombing Mexico.
Why do we want them?
“Katherine Thompson, who is doing the job of assistant defense secretary for international affairs, repeatedly told lawmakers that there is an ongoing Pentagon review of troop totals and no decisions have been made. But, asked again two hours into the hearing whether the U.S. would give up the SACEUR job, she said, “**my definitive answer is no**.”
Europe could start with its own take on the Monroe doctrine:
Any intervention in the political affairs of Europe and the Mediterranean by foreign powers is a potentially hostile act against the
That’s cute, they think he cares about their opinions.
Errrr no. Leave. Don’t return. Bye.
Once you take them out, you are out permanently.
You lost your presence in EU. You are not welcome to return later on a whim.
Well then, they better GET RID of Trump!!!!