Bangladesh, Colombia, Egypt, India, Kosovo, Morocco and Tunisia If you’re wondering.
ZestycloseBeach5946 on
Nigeria needs to be added to the list. Outside of Ukraine they represent the largest group and it is widely considered safe.
When people use the refugee status as a form of economic migration although I can understand why they might do it it is unfair on those people who go through legitimate channels to get work here and it backs up the system for those in genuine need of asylum.
AhAhAhAh_StayinAlive on
That seems totally insane that we were taking in apparent asylum seekers from these countries when many of them are literally holiday destinations for irish people. That is so crazy, I can’t believe how stupid this system is.
mrbuddymcbuddyface on
I know a person who came to Ireland as an asylum seeker from Cameroon, and now has a nice townhouse in Dublin via the local authority.
Despite fleeing Cameroon, they are able to return there for 6 weeks every year to visit family and look after the property they own there and rent out.
Augustus_Chevismo on
Is EU now far right 🤔
gokurotfl on
As a gay immigrant who moved here from Poland because me and my partner felt unsafe enough there (funny that we would be considered economic migrants even though that was absolutely not the reason why we moved here) and were lucky to live in a part of the world where we can move freely, I feel uneasy seeing everyone declaring some countries where people like me would be in actual life threatening danger safe.
janon93 on
The matter over whether a country is “safe” depends on who is leaving said country.
Someone being targeted by a gang isn’t someone I’d call “safe” to send back to Colombia.
I don’t think we should do this based on country, it should be by circumstance and how much danger they’re in.
7 commenti
Bangladesh, Colombia, Egypt, India, Kosovo, Morocco and Tunisia If you’re wondering.
Nigeria needs to be added to the list. Outside of Ukraine they represent the largest group and it is widely considered safe.
When people use the refugee status as a form of economic migration although I can understand why they might do it it is unfair on those people who go through legitimate channels to get work here and it backs up the system for those in genuine need of asylum.
That seems totally insane that we were taking in apparent asylum seekers from these countries when many of them are literally holiday destinations for irish people. That is so crazy, I can’t believe how stupid this system is.
I know a person who came to Ireland as an asylum seeker from Cameroon, and now has a nice townhouse in Dublin via the local authority.
Despite fleeing Cameroon, they are able to return there for 6 weeks every year to visit family and look after the property they own there and rent out.
Is EU now far right 🤔
As a gay immigrant who moved here from Poland because me and my partner felt unsafe enough there (funny that we would be considered economic migrants even though that was absolutely not the reason why we moved here) and were lucky to live in a part of the world where we can move freely, I feel uneasy seeing everyone declaring some countries where people like me would be in actual life threatening danger safe.
The matter over whether a country is “safe” depends on who is leaving said country.
Someone being targeted by a gang isn’t someone I’d call “safe” to send back to Colombia.
I don’t think we should do this based on country, it should be by circumstance and how much danger they’re in.