Share.

    20 commenti

    1. SraminiElMejorBeaver on

      At least everyone is supporting this idea, i guess France will put Rafale with ASMP as a temporary solution in Poland, for Germany we could imagine having in the end the missile fully integrated to an eurofighter but for Poland which as far as i see from wikipedia would have mostly american aircraft that would either be told not to or ask for confidential stuff about the missile, fa50 could end up in a similar situation and i’m unsure of the point of using it as a nuke aircraft.

    2. steph95E50 on

      Europe is responsible for building a new NATO
      The more Europe develops, the greater the dependence on the country, which it also constitutes.
      It appears extremely logical that to defend the interests of France, we protect Europe and vice versa for Poland and for all the countries constituting Europe.

    3. toolkitxx on

      Let me remind everyone that not long ago Poland also wanted US bombs. This irrational ‘need’ for nuclear weapons starts to become questionable. Maybe consult with your neighbours as well, how they think about this 😉

    4. Superkritisk on

      Centralize the EU into one country. There’s no room for a divided Europe anymore. Pick a national language, preferably English, and teach it in all schools. Build a unified EU military force and swing that new European big dick around.

      Europe has small dick energy right now, when big dick energy is needed.

    5. CutsAPromo on

      It’s stupid that they’re not allowed to build their own without incurring heavy sanctions

    6. AuSekours on

      Well, I can discuss that with the boss. But we’d like the land west of the Rhine in return. France’s Natural Borders baby! 

    7. Christina-Ke on

      It’s a really good idea, when even the Danish Prime Minister doesn’t want to rule out that we should have nuclear weapons, then I think there is a bigger security threat than we ordinary citizens are told.

      Denmark has been strongly against nuclear weapons and nuclear power since the early 1970s.

    8. LeftTailRisk on

      So what? Changes nothing.

      The only ones with the code is the French president. The fear is that the French president will not launch nukes over a Russian attack or is compromised like LePen.

      Poland would have nukes but instead of a “We won’t launch nukes for you” they would now get “We won’t give you the codes” as the answer 

      This thing changes **nothing**. Poland either needs it’s own nukes or hope the French will start a nuclear war over Poland. They fell for it once.

    9. dat_9600gt_user on

      Everyone could use them now. Denuclearization isn’t feasible anymore.

    10. HappyArkAn on

      I wish you could have it. And I wish my country wouldn’t use it in a funking hard negotiation

    11. Suheil-got-your-back on

      Actually this is quite surprising coming from PIS president Duda. They are staunch trump admirers.

    12. Nearby-Chocolate-289 on

      Maybe uk should pay for french nukes too. Hell all EU countries should pay for french nukes, nothing like economies of scale.

    13. Qwinn_SVK on

      Guys, can somebody explain me how NATO/Western countries treat nations that want to get a nuke? Cause Iran got sanctions to oblivion over it but if another country would develop/got a nuke but it’s a western country would there be a consequences? 🤔

    14. unused_user_name on

      I want French nukes in and under control of each responsible (but how do we identify current and future Hungary like Putin muppets?) member.

      Get rid of the us nukes that we can’t even operate ourselves, before Trump decides to charge rent for storing his nuclear waste in our countries.

    Leave A Reply