Why did you think it was interesting to post it here except for boasting about our nuclear capabilities? It has been discussed countless times here. Also one ICBM from Moscow could destroy Paris and it’s why it’s essential but also called nuclear deterrence.
zaplayer20 on
By the time the nuke reaches Moskow, 5000 nuclear missiles will reach the entire world. OP clearly has no clue about the consequences of such stupid acts, hence, why Russia didn’t nuked Ukraine already.
Expert-Length871 on
OP, don’t fall for this.
This is not the way to do things.
Defence is. Threats like the others, no.
NumberOneSteve on
Why the fuck are we even entertaining this idea as a species? I hate human beings.
Redragontoughstreet on
Yo can Canada buy one of these?
hypercomms2001 on
That would probably bring a smile to everyone else in the world except to Donald Trump….
LetterHopeful on
Destroy Moscow that’s a brilliant idea! Make sure Putin’s home first !
Ashamed-Agency-817 on
Interesting
Sendflutespls on
And this is only the missile. Submarine is out of picture just to the left.
BrigadierKirk on
Isn’t that the case with most nuclear missiles. 1 missiles tends to destroy a city lol. It seems strange and not really news worthy beyond Le terrible name (lol, I’m sorry for the pun).
Pale_Till8589 on
DEFCON 5 Alert
mcd3424 on
Can France do a live fire test run with a Ukrainian or Polish crew?
WoodpeckerFew6178 on
This is just stupid, one nuke from Russia could destroy Paris too
Long-Leadership-1958 on
my opinion on this is we shouldn’t do that. We shouldn’t nuke them or launch stuff at Moscow because we will pay for it they will nuke us to bits it’s really not worth it
LukasJackson67 on
We don’t need the USA…we have a French nuclear umbrella
NoctisScriptor on
kinda stupid. the submarine isn’t a missile. it’s a submarine. it was built in 2008. it’s already outdated. it carries 16 M45 or M51 missiles with six to ten TN 75 150 kt or TNO 100-300 kt thermonuclear warheads.
each warhead is enough to destroy moscow.
but it wouldn’t. moscow is the most heavily defended city against ICBM’s in the world. it would have to fire all the missiles for one warhead to have a chance to hit.
also russia has over 5000 nukes and a very large territory and more ballistic missile submarines than the entire europe combined. france has only about 300.
things are not as simple as they seem.
goldtabgibson on
Wow, good job. quite impressive..
Well.. the french are, maybe it would look better if you didn’t add “le” in front of the name when naming things.
I mean, I don’t want to belittle a very powerful nuclear weapon, but “le” looks a bit… how should I put it… cute?
Idk, maybe it just seems that way to me.
awesumpawesum on
Send it.
DisguisedCat-2 on
Missile name: Le weak
jkoki088 on
I mean, yes, a nuclear missile would destroy a city
Just-a-French-dude95 on
GLOIRE À L’ATOME !
Sumpflager on
That missle launch might as well destroy Paris to not waste anyones time waiting for the counterattack lol.
paushi on
Its important to show that europe isnt completely defenceless against America or Russia.
pbashu11 on
Beautiful nuke. Better than American nukes. I mean the French always had a great design.
EBBBBBBBBBBBB on
One missile launch will also destroy every nation on earth. This isn’t something to be proud of.
imtired-boss on
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Cisleithania on
Nothing wrong with posting military hardware, but i agree with some of the commenters here: Let’s not talk about Russians like Vladimir Solovyov talks about us.
Hertje73 on
A good initiative
Electrical-Case-5580 on
Allez les Bleus! From Greenland.
Nazebroque2000 on
A SSBN is probably one of the most technically complex thing to build.
An underwater missile launcher capable of carrying up to 16 nuclear missiles.
It can stay underwater for three months straight without surfacing, thanks to a nuclear reactor.
It also needs to be completely undetectable, and still be able to communicate with the outside world..
When you think about it that’s not just engineering, that’s solving the impossible.
zep2floyd on
Disgusting doomsday day weapon regardless of who owns it.
Captain-Obvious-69 on
Russia’s population is 140 million. Two nukes (Moscow & St Petersburg) and 10%+ of their population is cooked.
Impossible_Win869 on
people who see this as a solution and are even hoping or praying for it are truly scary to me.
No_Distribution_4351 on
UK has 4, France has 4, Russia has 12 and the US has 14. No one else in Europe has any. Do we see the problem here?
Darkdragoon324 on
Eh. Not as good as Subby McSubface.
South-Stand on
Big recommend for the movie Chant du Loup / the Wolf’s Call
Nearby-Chocolate-289 on
Beautiful.
The_Safety_Expert on
🤔
CAWNfucius on
She’s a beauty
britoonreddit on
Or Washington …
ForrestCFB on
I fucking hated france, like literally viewing them as surrender monkeys unironically.
But damn has my view on them changed in the last 3 years. And what have they showed us their true colors in Europe in the last few years (in a positive sense).
44 commenti
Sounds so much better in french 🥖🍟🥖
Why did you think it was interesting to post it here except for boasting about our nuclear capabilities? It has been discussed countless times here. Also one ICBM from Moscow could destroy Paris and it’s why it’s essential but also called nuclear deterrence.
By the time the nuke reaches Moskow, 5000 nuclear missiles will reach the entire world. OP clearly has no clue about the consequences of such stupid acts, hence, why Russia didn’t nuked Ukraine already.
OP, don’t fall for this.
This is not the way to do things.
Defence is. Threats like the others, no.
Why the fuck are we even entertaining this idea as a species? I hate human beings.
Yo can Canada buy one of these?
That would probably bring a smile to everyone else in the world except to Donald Trump….
Destroy Moscow that’s a brilliant idea! Make sure Putin’s home first !
Interesting
And this is only the missile. Submarine is out of picture just to the left.
Isn’t that the case with most nuclear missiles. 1 missiles tends to destroy a city lol. It seems strange and not really news worthy beyond Le terrible name (lol, I’m sorry for the pun).
DEFCON 5 Alert
Can France do a live fire test run with a Ukrainian or Polish crew?
This is just stupid, one nuke from Russia could destroy Paris too
my opinion on this is we shouldn’t do that. We shouldn’t nuke them or launch stuff at Moscow because we will pay for it they will nuke us to bits it’s really not worth it
We don’t need the USA…we have a French nuclear umbrella
kinda stupid. the submarine isn’t a missile. it’s a submarine. it was built in 2008. it’s already outdated. it carries 16 M45 or M51 missiles with six to ten TN 75 150 kt or TNO 100-300 kt thermonuclear warheads.
each warhead is enough to destroy moscow.
but it wouldn’t. moscow is the most heavily defended city against ICBM’s in the world. it would have to fire all the missiles for one warhead to have a chance to hit.
also russia has over 5000 nukes and a very large territory and more ballistic missile submarines than the entire europe combined. france has only about 300.
things are not as simple as they seem.
Wow, good job. quite impressive..
Well.. the french are, maybe it would look better if you didn’t add “le” in front of the name when naming things.
I mean, I don’t want to belittle a very powerful nuclear weapon, but “le” looks a bit… how should I put it… cute?
Idk, maybe it just seems that way to me.
Send it.
Missile name: Le weak
I mean, yes, a nuclear missile would destroy a city
GLOIRE À L’ATOME !
That missle launch might as well destroy Paris to not waste anyones time waiting for the counterattack lol.
Its important to show that europe isnt completely defenceless against America or Russia.
Beautiful nuke. Better than American nukes. I mean the French always had a great design.
One missile launch will also destroy every nation on earth. This isn’t something to be proud of.
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Nothing wrong with posting military hardware, but i agree with some of the commenters here: Let’s not talk about Russians like Vladimir Solovyov talks about us.
A good initiative
Allez les Bleus! From Greenland.
A SSBN is probably one of the most technically complex thing to build.
An underwater missile launcher capable of carrying up to 16 nuclear missiles.
It can stay underwater for three months straight without surfacing, thanks to a nuclear reactor.
It also needs to be completely undetectable, and still be able to communicate with the outside world..
When you think about it that’s not just engineering, that’s solving the impossible.
Disgusting doomsday day weapon regardless of who owns it.
Russia’s population is 140 million. Two nukes (Moscow & St Petersburg) and 10%+ of their population is cooked.
people who see this as a solution and are even hoping or praying for it are truly scary to me.
UK has 4, France has 4, Russia has 12 and the US has 14. No one else in Europe has any. Do we see the problem here?
Eh. Not as good as Subby McSubface.
Big recommend for the movie Chant du Loup / the Wolf’s Call
Beautiful.
🤔
She’s a beauty
Or Washington …
I fucking hated france, like literally viewing them as surrender monkeys unironically.
But damn has my view on them changed in the last 3 years. And what have they showed us their true colors in Europe in the last few years (in a positive sense).
Emmanuel Le Terrible.
Nous sommes tous France. Did I say it right?