Share.

    43 commenti

    1. Good. Now it’ll be easier to convince people here to expand cooperation with France.

    2. According-Buyer6688 on

      Good.

      Now shut down US products and choose European

      r/BuyFromEU

    3. Due_Professional_894 on

      build your own. Only need a handful or 2 really. One for Moscow and one for St.Petersberg.

    4. ParticularFix2104 on

      Not to suggest for a single nanosecond that JD Vance won’t burn in hell, but Poland getting US nukes stationed on its territory was always a bad idea. They wouldn’t even have been under Polish control. It was just moving American nukes out of Turkey or something.

      Europe needs to rearm itself with conventional forces, together.

    5. Primo2000 on

      Its not “Poland” but our president who is finishing his second term

    6. AdelaiNiskaBoo on

      Its about control. It no longer makes sense to them to station nukes in other countries.

      Their policy is probably sth like only if war is near they maybe transfer nukes to another country. But before that you have to negotiate about what you give them for that.

    7. Mr_sludge on

      Good. Poland is amazing, but needs to understand European independence the way forward. Same can be said for Denmark I suppose

    8. Zhukov-74 on

      France: *Slaps Nuke*

      “This bad boy can destroy an entire Russian city”

    9. SergenteA on

      If the EU wishes to be taken seriously and protect all its member states equally, it cannot rely on the USA or even France for nuclear deterrence. Even the latter may fall to russian-paid traitors like Reassemble National. Yet also, each state having its own program would be expensive and damage unitity.

      Thereby I propose an Union-shared nuclear arsenal. Another step towards federalism and a unified European Army.

    10. Appropriate_Air_2671 on

      It’s known for ages right now that Americans are not a trustworthy ally. I am actually incredibly glad they just say this out loud right now. The louder they are, they less people will naively count on them 

    11. OkSite8356 on

      I understand that Poland wants to desperately save the security we had for past few decades, but US has decided. They voted for complete moron as president and this sleazy A-hole.

      They are not trustworthy and it will take decades and deep reform on republican side to build the trust back.

      US are not friend anymore, they dropped below China in regard of coldness.

    12. nouskeys on

      Is it even possible to see through these complicated 4d geopolitical maneuvers. /s

    13. Shallowmoustache on

      At least we know under which pretense the US will refuse to intervene in Europe when Russia attacks one of NATO country.

      They will be fearmongering a nuclear worldwar, will not move a finger and will condemn any European country fighting back.

    14. Striking-Fix7012 on

      Next time, if your country wants to place B-61s at Poland or even the Baltic states. The EU would like you to BEG

    15. bungle123 on

      Good. Asking for a handout from the US is pathetic, at this point.

    16. fatguy19 on

      The UK and France have enough weapons grade material for thousands of nukes, i wish starmer would pick a side already

    17. Nippes60 on

      The behaviour of the US is so dangerous. This can start a nuclear weapon race all over the world.

      Germany, Poland, South Korea, Japan, etc.

    18. PotatoEngeneeer on

      Is there now even the chance of protecting us if we don’t do EU nuclear umbrella?

      If the french are the only one with nukes than the russians will just do their hybrid warefare campaign even heavier there

    19. BeatTheMarket30 on

      Nuclear deterrance should be implemented by nuclear weapons being available to EU army.

    20. Christina-Ke on

      Poland should probably talk to France instead 😏

      Or join forces with my country Denmark where our prime minister “will not rule out that we will have nuclear weapons in a few years”

      Translated, it pretty much means we will have nuclear weapons in a few years.

      So I think they should contact Denmark.

    21. Spooknik on

      I hope Poland gets the message now, US isn’t your “closest strategic partner” anymore. Guys like Vance hate our guts for some reason and will screw us over.

    22. Hustinettenlord on

      Good. French nukes or EU nukes it is. In the long run we need a EU nuke triad.

    23. FluffyDeer9323 on

      I feel like the world needs to hear less from a US VP, especially this village idiot.

    24. Adventurous-Host8062 on

      At one time, it was thought we knew exactly how many nukes were out there and which countries had them. That time is past.

    25. Shoddy_Squash_1201 on

      France is the only country that has done defence right.

    26. Nervous_Book_4375 on

      America seems to fail in grasping that the only good thing Europe Respects and Needs from the USA is their Military. (Of course we respect other things but currently Trump is giving us nothing to be happy about).
      If we don’t have there military support a new military power will arise in the world and it will be in Europe.
      If Trump truly is a Russian asset he has achieved the dumb! Russia can’t invade NATO. Because it’s a paradox.
      Invade to get more land. Invasion triggers millions of Russian deaths. Then the land is devastated by nukes. Land needs massive clean up and no one wants to live there. It’s just stupid. Ukraine is the only unusual part in all this and Europe must support it.

    27. Who is to say what weapons they can have and others don’t. Hypocrites

    28. Jumba2009sa on

      Poland should just pull the trigger and start a joint nuclear program with France. Ditch the non proliferation treaty, it’s a relic of a past that is no longer relevant.

    29. morphiusn on

      Didn’t Vance said that EU should stop being vassal of american armed security?

    30. Never-Late-In-A-V8 on

      > Vance said he hadn’t discussed the issue with President Donald Trump but would be “shocked” if his boss supported extending America’s nuclear arsenal further east. “We have got to be careful, Laura, we are playing literally with the lives of the future of human civilization,” he warned.

      How the fuck he said that with a straight face I do not know.

    31. deagonlt on

      He’s only saying no because their end goal is to support Russians and fight against rest of Nato. So its pretty clear why he’s not giving any nukes.

    32. Kermit-T-Hermit on

      Just ask Sweden nicely to look if they have one in the basement….. We all know they do….

    33. Elbrus-matt on

      there are only 3 countries in europe capable of supporting the entire infrastructure,develop and deliver the payload: Russia,Uk,France,+Germany.
      The eastern european countries were capable,back when they were part of the soviet block but always unable to do all of it,not even ukraine has done it,the only country in eastern europe integrated in the ussr space,heavy industrial base and military production.
      If ukraine was capable to make it happen without russian help(i don’t mean back in the 90′ when they go bankrupt,the same as russia,with a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons,impossible to mantain for a country like ukraine),no Russian invasion would have been possible.

    Leave A Reply