Share.

    27 commenti

    1. Odd_Science5770 on

      A “green” call. Smh… This is why the world doesn’t take Europe seriously.

    2. YusoLOCO on

      Idk what a ‘Green call’ is but I agree we need a federal EU.

    3. 1Hurjimus on

      Greens can go to hell, they are the reason why Europe is lagging on every front!

    4. Mikkel65 on

      > Trump fears a Europe that leads the green transition

      What? Who are the European Greens? This article just sounds stupid. Although a good message.

    5. ChargeIllustrious744 on

      Holy cow, this amount of nonsensical propaganda is pretty shocking, even from such joke parties like the greens πŸ˜€

      “A fiscal union to tackle inequality”
      XDDDD

    6. Every_Pattern_8673 on

      Why go federal when we can see one federation crumbling on the other side of the pond already?

      Rather focus on improving the current union we have got, no need to start fucking up something that is better than currently available alternatives.

    7. anxcaptain on

      Would be a wonderful thing to see. Along with the central agency for discovering all these Russian assets.

    8. ChargeIllustrious744 on

      “Trump fears a Europe that leads the green transition”

      XDDDDD

      What have you guys been smoking? In case you haven’t realized, trump is wiping the floor with the EU, exactly because of incompetent daydreamers like the greens. We are falling behind not just the US, but also China in innovation, and therefore the EU is constantly loosing its leftover power in international politics.

      Very dark times are ahead of Europe, and you guys are not only unable to provide solutions, but you even fail to recognize the problems. No wonder why extremist parties are on the rise all over Europe…

    9. toolkitxx on

      Yeah, let’s not do that when we are preparing for a possible war. We have some more pressing issues currently

    10. Expert-Length871 on

      Of course. There are secessionists in your fantabulous group. Who don’t give a shit about the Europe of Nations… unless it’s that of their made-up little country.

      So you want something like a federation, you’ll have 3723 little countries.

      A great idea, no doubt. I don’t even get into the stupidities of how to handle renewable energy and the demonisation of nuclear power. Because I do remember how they answered about how to replace it. Practically and quickly, not with 100-year plans… Silence. Or excuses.

      Only 1 out of 10 were well informed and gave real ideas.

      And I don’t even stop with the animal rights activists.

      I love animals (except humans) but some of the idiotic things they say, there is no one who can stand them.

    11. eucariota92 on

      The 988697 pathetic attempt of green parties to spread their propaganda to keep on destroying Europe.

      Trump doesn’t give a shit about Europe leading any kind of green movement, same as any other country in the world. Quite the contrary, he must be laughing his ass off seeing how we are destroying our economy and industry for complete nonsense.

    12. ChargeIllustrious744 on

      I see a very deep ignorance in so many commenters. No wonder why the EU is so goddamn weak: you guys don’t understand even the most fundamental dynamics of the interactions between Europe’s nations. You guys just want to force your own dogmatic, ignorant ideology on to everyone, not even considering WHY most european nations don’t want a federal EU.

      You know, there is a reason for that. Europe has a very troubled history, and there are so many conflicts that have never been resolved, just suppressed… Most westerners are completely oblivious and ignorant about these topics.

      Europe will NEVER be united until (1) western countries get off from their high horses, face their own hypocrisy, and start treating eastern countries as equal, instead of keeping colonizing and patronizing them, and (2) the aforementioned plethora of ethnic and cultural conflicts are addressed.

      Only after these essential steps could we even start dreaming about making a federation, realistically. You can force it before too, but it’s doomed to fail.

    13. spykovic on

      We do need to get rid of the commission and install a democratic body instead. Europe will never get legitimate in the mind of its citizens as it is.

    14. samueIlll on

      I agree with most of this, it’s just a shame about the ‘We must not view migration and solidarity beyond borders as threats to our identity but as essential to what we stand for’ part.

      Even though I want a common European identity, we can’t deny that migrants from the conflict-ridden countries mentioned (Palestine as in Congo, Myanmar, Sudan and Ukraine), with the exception of Ukraine, would face a huge culture shock arriving in Europe and would have significant difficulty trying to integrate with our culture.

      Being pro-migration is not always pro-European, it’s pro-European to be pro-migration and pro-assimilation only. I wouldn’t take migrants who still believe in mutilating women’s genitals from the DR, and any migration policy should be similar to the Danish model.

    15. LeroyoJenkins on

      Ah, yes, the greens, who largely came out of the pacifist movements usually funded by the Soviet Union and strongly advocating for one-sided European disarmament while Russia kept arming themselves.

      Fuck those anti-NATO useful idiots.

      And before anyone comes with “but acxchtually…”, just listen to the greens themselves:

      https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/are-green-parties-still-pacifists/

      > Many European Green Parties have their origins in the peace movements of the 1950s through to the 1980s.

      > In West Germany, huge protests followed the deployment of short-range nuclear missiles in the country by the US in the early 1980s. These helped propel the Green Party into parliament for the first time. β€œIt was, of course, a pacifist party,” explains Reinhard Olschanski, an advisor to the German Green Party. The West German Greens were anti-NATO as a military alliance with nuclear weapons, and in favour of disarmament. β€œIt was a great point of identity with the Green Party,” he said.

      > In the Netherlands, GroenLinks (Green Left) was formed in 1989 by the merger of four left-wing parties, including the Pacifist Socialist Party. In the UK, the peace movement and Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament had a strong influence on the emerging Green Party, with a significant crossover in membership. Green Parties generally advocated unilateral nuclear disarmament, opposition to NATO membership, and a broadly pacifist policy combined with the promotion of democracy and human rights.

      > β€œWe weren’t necessarily wrong back then [in the 1980s],” said Erik Apel from the Swedish Green Party. β€œThe main ideas of dΓ©tente, non-alignment, and international nuclear disarmament are still there. But now we are no longer caught in the build-up between two superpowers threatening nuclear war.” Yet the emergence of a more militant Russia means Sweden faces real and immediate threats in a way it did not in the 1990s. β€œBoth these things have undermined the case for pacifism and non-violent defence,” Apel said.

      Ah, the classic “we weren’t wrong but please daddy protect us now!”

    16. I truly believe Europe will not be able to sufficiently keep up with the great powers until they federalize. Then, they will be on par with the Chinese and Americans.

    Leave A Reply