A parte l’impegno della NATO previsto. La riforma delle pensioni inizia in realtà essere una cosa (ricordo in uno dei miei precedenti post che le persone si sono arrabbiate quando l’ho menzionato) è anche una sorpresa che si è interrotto la misura di supporto per l’edilizia abitativa giugno
di Fast_Gap7215
6 commenti
The pension reform seems cosmetic. It’s positive but not enough. People will retire later, pay more to the system, and then get a higher pension for a shorter remaining lifetime
>The aim is to “financially secure the system for the next 15 years
I believe this is the timeframe for the minimum reserve amount to be reached, which was expected to happen in 2039. This reform might be effective in 2026, plus 15 brings us to 2041, so 2 years later. Bravo, Luc!
On housing, Bellegen akt stays at 40k but was supposed to decrease next month
not clear, why to invest billions to AI, if we don’t expect that it will increase our productivity and we will still have to increase the retirement age 🙂
> While the retirement age will stay the same – at 65 – the number of contribution years will be gradually increased, “by three months each year over a number of years”. Currently, that number is at 40 years. Frieden did not reveal by how much it would rise in the end. That should move the real average retirement age of 60 closer to the legal retirement age.
> Years spent studying or out of work to have children will continue to contribute to those years.
> The aim is to “financially secure the system for the next 15 years,” the PM said. The reform proposal in full will be presented before the summer and changes will not impact people already retired or close to retirement.
Mediocre, insufficient, a joke, essentially avoiding the problem and deferring it to another government. This will hit us again.
> The PM announced no new housing measures, saying that the immediate construction sector crisis “is behind us” and that “it is not the state’s role to support the housing market indefinitely. The market has to function on its own.
Lunatic.
My proposal: increase the contribution to 9%, stop capping the contributions to those making incredible amount of money, reform the public sector various ultra generous schemes. Don’t get me wrong it sounds ok to favour the public sector when the economy is thriving, but right now it feels awkward that no major reform is being taken. At the end of the day people should still be able to leave at 60 if they want and the max difference between 60 and 65 should be 20% less revenues.
[removed]
I’m quite disappointed:
1. No word on the competitiveness of our financial hub (what about the competition of Ireland and liquid AuM running away ?)
2. Pensions modest reforms will not apply to the current retirees which I believe is a shame as: i) They overall have better standards of living than the working population (similar situation than in France) and ii) They ares the ones who kept the system for decades and protesting against any earlier reform despite the fact that the current issues with pe soon payments were 99% predictable decades ago