
Chiamate per l’imposta sulla ricchezza come elenco ricco mostra £ 772 miliardi nelle mani di solo 350 famiglie
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/rich-list-wealth-tax-patriotic-millionaires-sunday-times-rich-list-b2752300.html
di VulcanSpark
25 commenti
Don’t worry it’ll start to trickle down any day now.
Steal all that money, every single penny, and you can pay for the state pension for ~7 years. Then it’s gone
tax is only for the poor.
[Prince Charles given €3m in cash in bags by Qatari politician, according to report | King Charles III | The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/25/prince-charles-is-said-to-have-been-given-3m-in-qatari-cash)
Trickling down as i type this comment, will buy a house (miniature, one bed bungalow in central London) with my portion of the trickle down
This will not happen for sure and they will direct people instead on immigration topics
Even just properly taxing housing would be a huge benefit. Council tax capped at £6k is insane. If we had a 1% market value tax it would not only generate hundreds of billions but it would also
1. tax wealth locked in residential housing (£9trn)
2. motivate older generations to actually downsize freeing up family homes in economic centres
3. help put downward pressure on high house prices.
High house prices alone are estimated to be a 20-30% detractor to GDP. Brexit is estimated to be 2-4%….
How about alongside the Rich List we list the top 250 tax payers in the country.
Number 1 gets to live in Buckingham Palace free of charge.
You’re only allowed to own a Premier League team if you are in the top 100.
Top 250 lets you see an NHS dentist.
The problem with having *that much* wealth is that it snowballs, because you can just use your passive income to buy up all the assets. You don’t even need to invest smart because you have so much money even just 1 or 2 pc interest will be enough to buy a house every day of the year in perpetuity.
Which is precisely the problem. The core problem is that ultra wealthy people do not invest their money in productive ways, there’s no incentive for them to take any risk whatsoever because they can just keep on snowballing their wealth on the absolute slimmest of margins.
What needs to happen is either tax + redistribute… Or alternatively, you need to somehow force wealthy people to only invest in productive pursuits.
My idea… Anyone worth over 5 million pounds (or some other threshold, it’s not important) can no longer buy *existing* properties. They are only allowed to build new ones.
That one little line of code right there would go a long way. With no tax increase, and minimal intervention.
You see they don’t have that much, they really can’t afford to pay, taxes, higher wages etc..
No, £772bn *worth of assets* is in the hands of 350 families. It’s not like it’s all cash in a current account you could take a few billion from with them barely noticing.
“Wealth tax” is a slogan, not a policy.
Yeah, sounds great but it better be a surprise move, if it’s given some publicity, they’ll have their wealth out of here so quick you’ll never see the footsie fall so fast.
This mentality is killing the UK.
Instead of going after the rich with wealth taxes, we should instead be focusing on growth and actually growing the middle class.
France did wealth tax and it led to capital flight. They don’t work. The UK already has the highest taxes on the rich in the world. We should aim to focus on creating a productive economy, not finding scapegoats.
Taxing them 25% of their wealth would gain us £193 billion, or a 16% rise in our budget for a single year. It barely seems worth it.
Yeah but someday I’ll be a millionaire and I dont want to pay taxes on money I will never spend
Guys no way, they deserve that wealth. They just work 772,000,000,000,000 times harder than us.
Keep talking about immigrants and trans people instead.
Those 350 families have enough money to bribe all parties. End of story.
We can’t possibly dilute the royal family’s wealth, I mean that wouldn’t be fair at all, right?
People don’t understand, taxing things is a system for discouraging things.
Wealth tax isn’t just about getting the billions now, it’s about discouraging people buying 50 homes and putting assets back into the lower and middle class
Rich get richer. Big yawn.
The real problem is where are trans people are shitting!
/s
At this point it’s not even about increasing the tax for them. 50% on earnings of a billion/pa is plenty, its more about closing the loopholes they are all using to pay almost nothing.
“Sometimes I do wish apples were our currency So your hoarded millions would rot in their vaults And that’d teach you to lay off the assault That you’re barraging on the lands of the poor” – Enter Shikari
LOL this one again? There’s stupid and then there’s believing a wealth tax is a good idea stupid…
Let’s try it again, once more for luck; wealth is assets, assets are property, property is plant, buildings, land and businesses etc., tax that more and you do one of two things; cause a commensurate rise in prices or a commensurate loss in jobs.
Businesses only work if there is adequate return on investment, money in must exceed money out enough to make it profitable. Wreck that and away fly the businesses.
Plus, as we’ve already seen with the wealthy non-doms; the super rich just up sticks and leave, taking their money, tax revenue and ready investments with them to other countries. Same happened to Norway when instituting their wealth tax.
This whole “trickle down” thing is just the latest flat Earth fad, people have got to be stupid to not understand that money _flows_.
Maybe I’m dyslexic,
Because I keep reading we need more austerity cuts, boondoggle spending and f*ck the poor.
Isn’t “our” democracy grand?
Meanwhile, the actual news here is that the UK saw more billionaires (and the tax they pay) depart last year than any year on record, due to the changes to the various tax regimes.
Great way to lower the tax take. Real smart.
How many times does this conversation need to happen?
It’s all basic, predictable economics that Reddit is fixated on not understanding.