L’accordo significa che i soldati statunitensi saranno in Danimarca sotto la giurisdizione degli Stati Uniti, il che significa che se dovessero commettere un crimine ovunque in Danimarca, in primo luogo sarebbero stati puniti sotto gli Stati Uniti, non il sistema legale, non danese.
Dà anche ai soldati a noi l’accesso alle basi aeree danesi in tre città danesi – Karup, Skrydstrup e Aalborg – e dà soldati americani e poteri di polizia militare rispetto ai civili danesi in queste località e al di fuori di loro.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/19/alarm-over-defence-agreement-giving-us-unhindered-access-to-danish-airbases
di nogooduse
2 commenti
Den skal vel lige stemmes igennem Folketinget først, og jf Grundlovens paragraf 20, så skal “afgivelse af suverænitet” stemmes igennem Folketinget med 5/6 for, og opnås et sådant flertal ikke skal det til folkeafstemning.
https://www.ft.dk/da/dokumenter/bestil-publikationer/publikationer/mingrundlov/min-grundlov/kapitel-3/paragraf-20
Not Danish, but I spent about six months in Denmark for work, and something always baffled me. Not meant to offend, but I am genuinely curious why Denmark appears to adopt a significantly more submissive posture towards the US compared to its Nordic neighbours.
Giving such control to the US in Greenland and Operation Dunhammer are the standout examples, but even considering allowing such sweeping powers to the US, regardless of who is president, is insane to me. And even in this article, the Danish foreign minister merely says they COULD suspend the agreement if the US annexes Greenland.
That this needs to be said shows to me just how far the balance seems to have swung as far as Denmark bowing to Washington’s wishes goes, and doing that for a nation that doesn’t seem to have any respect for its sovereignty, and is far less decent a nation than Denmark, is so disheartening and frustrating.