Share.

    8 commenti

    1. It’s not that he lied that annoys me, that’s to be expected, it’s that the ‘enquiry’ didn’t investigate his claims until he was exposed by the press.
      It makes you think they’re all in this together.

    2. cmfarsight on

      Who the fuck thought that creditors where insisting that people got bonuses. That suggests that they went to the creditors and said “we don’t want our bonus” and the creditors said “no I insist you take it, don’t spend the money improving the business to make it more likely we get our money back, put it in your pocket, even though you just said you don’t want it”

      I can’t see any other conversation where the creditor insists on bonuses.

    3. Paddy3118 on

      If the **effect** of having misspoken is similar to having lied, then he needs to convince them that it was unintentional or be treated as a liar.
      Don’t allow him to hide behind wordplay!
      You could in fact treat it as a lie and have his argued intentionality dictate a large part of his punishment – if they think it was intended then throw the book at him.

    4. Pheanturim on

      They are all fucking eels. Out for themselves and fuck all else.

    5. Major_Bag_8720 on

      “Misspoke” becoming an acceptable substitute for “lied” was one of the many steps to the situation we find ourselves in today.

    6. No-Opposite6601 on

      So he lied and is now trying to cover his arse saying he misspoke?

    7. WebDevWarrior on

      You want to know what kind of people these clowns are? Watch the Thames Water disaster documentary on iPlayer.

      It’s hilarious. They did it to try and make them appear more sympathetic, but it made them appear psychotic and they paraded their guilt as a badge of honour.

    8. Thebritishdovah on

      More like “Oh shit, I shouldn’t have said that. Oh shit, I definitely shouldn’t have mentioned it coming out of the loans. Oh shit, ah, it’s too hot. I’ll claim I mispoke.”

    Leave A Reply