Le chiamate per richiedere legalmente i supermercati per rivelare i clienti “restringimento”
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/cost-living/3cadbe71b77e40daa1646b1e39acd019/
di ThatchersDirtyTaint
Le chiamate per richiedere legalmente i supermercati per rivelare i clienti “restringimento”
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/cost-living/3cadbe71b77e40daa1646b1e39acd019/
di ThatchersDirtyTaint
5 commenti
250g of rice was perfect for a single meal for me, not too much yet not too little just mama bear territory!
But 220g??? It leaves me craving an extra spoonful of rice! But it’s too much for me to open another bag!
Seriously? Did you think I was not going to notice when the packet has 220g written on it with huge letters?
CURSE YOU UNCLE BEN!!! YOU DIDN’T DESERVE TO BECOME A FORCE GHOST!
75g uncooked, I’m guessing 250g is the microwave packet cooked weight
_”They need to be called out on it and for shoppers to know when they are at risk of being ripped off”_. With a net profit of about 3% this old bollocks about supermarkets ripping people off is just obvious nonsense. What do they want, supermarkets to do, sell at a loss? How much less profit can they make?
Plus all the information regarding weight is already on the packaging and legally has be so.
They already tell us the price by weight on the label. What fucking use is it to me to know what it was two months ago? I’m making my purchasing decision now, today, with today’s data.
Id rather they display the calories per item/bag you buy personally. You buy a product say 175g, and they tell you the calories per 100g. Well thats no use tell me what it is per 175g without me having to do maths