La Commissione dell’UE rifiuta di rivelare gli orchestratori dietro la sua proposta di sorveglianza di massa, che porrebbe effettivamente porre fine alla privacy online dei cittadini.

    https://i.redd.it/saxw1feg4o4f1.jpeg

    di Dry_Row_7050

    Share.

    39 commenti

    1. Dry_Row_7050 on

      [When German MEP Patrick Breyer requested the names](https://fragdenstaat.de/anfrage/sub-groups-working-groups-of-the-high-level-expert-group-on-access-to-data-for-effective-law-enforcement/#nachricht-842415) of the individuals involved in the [High-Level Group on Access to Data for Effective Law Enforcement](https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/document/download/4802e306-c364-4154-835b-e986a9a49281_en?filename=Concluding%20Report%20of%20the%20HLG%20on%20access%20to%20data%20for%20effective%20law%20enforcement_en.pdf)
      —the group behind the EU’s latest mass surveillance proposal—the EU Commission responded with a document where all names were blacked out. According to digital rights group EDRi:

      [“The HLG has kept its work sessions closed, strictly controlled which stakeholders got invited, and effectively shut down civil society participation.”](https://edri.org/our-work/high-level-group-going-dark-outcome-a-mission-failure/)

      Their plan includes restrictions on encryption, surveillance mandates, sanctioning messaging apps and more. By the way Chat Control isn’t dead and is also being pushed in such a secrecy [EU ombudsman has concluded it maladministration.](https://www.euronews.com/next/2024/07/18/european-ombudsman-slams-commission-for-secretive-approach-to-child-sexual-abuse-law). Chat Control would, in addition to also banning secure encryption, force people [to register on social media with their own identities](https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/). Good thing there isn’t an EU-wide digital identity incoming, right?

      Despite this secrecy and the dystopian proposal itself, the group’s recommendations are now being used as a primary source for the [EU Commission’s “ProtectEU” strategy for 2029](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0148). On top of those proposals the commission wants to make Europol the ”FBI or Europe”, while Europol’s boss says [Big Tech has ‘responsibility’ to unlock encrypted messages to protect democracy](https://www.ft.com/content/1e6a600d-8620-4ed6-a4cd-5c454d6247ba). The same Europol that [has been criticized by EU ombudsman for their ties with a chat control tech service provider Thorn](https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-eu-ombudsman-criticises-revolving-door-between-europol-and-chat-control-tech-lobbyist-thorn/)

      Anyway since every paragraph halves the amount of people making it to the end, here’s what you can do

      [Contact your MEP](https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/home)

      Give EU your feedback on their [new GDPR destroying data retention proposal](https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14680-Impact-assessment-on-retention-of-data-by-service-providers-for-criminal-proceedings-/feedback_en?p_id=57023308)

      And spread the news, on social media and in real life.

    2. Ofurnic8tor69 on

      I want to know, which portuguese MP´s are behind this, and what do they have to say about it 🙂

    3. It’s amazing how the EU is both building the privacy walls and demolishing them at the same time. I thought we were supposed to have common values. Apparently, the citizens understand, as we keep protesting this fucking proposal. Yet leadership keeps proposing it.

    4. MogwaiYT on

      It’s beyond satire. Blanked out list of people opposing other people’s privacy 😐

    5. ExtraMaize5573 on

      The unknown oligarchy will protect the working mans interests! What could go wrong trusting a unknown cabal?

    6. WillingRich2745 on

      Then we should make some educated guesses. Regarding Germany: There are parts of some parties (especially the CDU/CSU) that historically tended to push into this direction. Therefore I highly suspect leading CDU/CSU EU Politicians. Which parties/persons do you guys suspect?

    7. CuriousCat31441 on

      Can someone explain to me how this differs from the US patriot act? 

      I am very much against this, but I wish to understand how it compares to the patriot act that has beeen in effect in the us since 2001. Does this go further than that?

    8. ItsMeishi on

      Privacy for me but not for thee. Quite obvious that they know they wouldnt be safe if their names were out there, because clearly, it would be a VERY unpopular proposal amongst the general plebs. And rightly so.

    9. ReturnOfTheSaint14 on

      Yes because Europe reallyyyyy needs a PATRIOT Act-esque law,right? Just look at how well it performed in the States the total control of everyone’s privacy

    10. National_Pay_5847 on

      Oh but I thought EU is wonderful and we’d go to shit without them?

      It’s not the first time they’re pulling bullshit like this.

    11. ImLonenyNunlovable on

      Isnt it quite a problem regarding corruption when state level actors impede transparency purposefully?

    12. Golden_Ace1 on

      Well, turning europe into a 1984 dystopia seems like a dream to them.

      The problem is that europeans keep voting for them (same here in Portugal).

      Ventura, Le Pen, Kickl thrive in the hate bait, false arguments, and the moderate parties are incompetently adressing the subjects. Their leaders lack charisma, leadership and plausible solutions, making things worse for everyone instead of proving them wrong by acting competently.

    13. Scotandia21 on

      Where did this come from? I thought the EU was all about *protecting* privacy.

    14. Eric-Lodendorp on

      I’d like to actually speak to my MEP but fuck me because apparently the people voting against privacy get themselves the privacy to not be held accountable.

    15. 21Justanotherguy on

      This is one of the few topic I’m good with it being repeted even every day. Everyone must know

    16. Betonkauwer on

      I love how easily swayed europhiles are. Give people a few token handwaves, take away their basic right of privacy and then be bought by Qatar. Yet they keep simping for this totalitarian group.

    17. Guessing the participants being from different coutries are somehow tied to another entity and they don’t want you to know which.

    18. deceased_parrot on

      Why is no one pushing for an opposite bill? A bill that enshrines our “digital rights and freedoms” and makes pushing for this kind of nonsense (and they’ve been pushing this for a long, long while) much harder, if not impossible?

    19. insomnimax_99 on

      People who want to end online privacy refuse to give up their privacy online. Rules for thee but not for me.

    20. zumbaj-agumeja on

      Our government just collapsed an hour ago. The PM (“tricky” Dick Schoof) used to be the head of the intelligence agency. Maybe he can have his job back now.

    21. wgszpieg on

      It’s shit like this that drives the alt-right surge.

      The alt-right will also use these tools to destroy democracy, of course, but for now it’s a great platform for them to score easy victories

    22. Brilliant_Injury_525 on

      Is there any protest organised in Bruxelles? How to organise one?
      I have been told MEPs don’t pay much attention to emails received by constituents.

    23. Vegetable_Mission892 on

      Von der Leyen blacking out parts of documents that are of interest? Some people never change i guess.

    24. NoSkillzDad on

      Wait, let me get this straight, *they* get privacy while trying to strip us of ours? **Fuck** that. We should be able to access this information one way or another.

    25. Consistent_Catch9917 on

      Considering those people very likely are members of the national intelligence service and or cybercrime units, the censorship is no surprise.

    Leave A Reply