Rachel Reeves che gira intorno alle finanze del Regno Unito “come lo Steve Jobs ha fatto per Apple”, rivendica il ministro

    https://news.sky.com/story/rachel-reeves-turning-around-uks-finances-like-steve-jobs-did-for-apple-claims-minister-13380643?dcmp=snt-sf-twitter

    di tylerthe-theatre

    Share.

    15 commenti

    1. Krabsandwich on

      Might be a bit of an ask for Rachel, we will see soon enough if she is another Steve Jobs. I have my doubts but you never know.

    2. ragebunny1983 on

      Tax the rich. Finances aren’t the issue, inequality is.

    3. salamanderwolf on

      What, overpriced, difficult for everyone to afford, and gets updated to be something worse every year?

      Think we’re already there.

    4. If you are successfully turning around the nations finances, you don’t usually need to repeatedly state you are turning around the nations finances. You just point to the graph and the reports that show you are on track.

      The same with immigration, waiting lists and housebuilding. After two and a half decades of endless spin, no-one will trust a political talking head making assertions, we need to see delivery.

    5. JackStrawWitchita on

      Comparing the finances of a for-profit company and a government reveals a lack of understanding fundamental economics.

    6. Even the farmers complaining about Inheritance Tax changes didn’t bring that much bullshit.

      Maybe Ministers can visit rose gardens around the country to deliver the manure where it is needed?

    7. CrushingPride on

      Copied other people’s ideas and claimed them as her own? Screamed at people for no reason? Washed her bare feet in the toilet bowl at the office?

    8. If we had a booming economy like we had several times in the past, a lot of the issues we have like investment and public sector spending would go away.

      The problem the Labour government have is they none of them have ever worked in or run a business so they’re missing the mark on everything.

      I hope Rachel manages to do what she wants to do because that would be good for all of us but my money is on them achieving the exact opposite

    9. Available_Monitor_92 on

      Let’s see how we are doing in two years. Too early to tell atm

    10. Background_Ad8814 on

      Honestly, do politicians look across the pond, and think, meh, why not?works for them

    11. ThatGuyMaulicious on

      No… She isn’t… There’s nothing good amount this economy right now.

    12. Only_Tip9560 on

      I judge on outcomes, not blather. However the market seems to like blather so I can’t blame them for pumping it out.

      Reeves is trapped by treasury orthodoxy and is trying to spin an ever diminishing set of plates that HMT are allowing to be considered. As others have said, real taxation reform doesn’t seem to be one of those plates. Double-taxing the pensions of ordinary working people does, however, seem to be one of the plates. Our demographics need to be acknowledged and focussing solely on a smaller pool of working tax payers is not the resolution to the issue we find ourselves in.

    13. Carbonatic on

      Be careful what you wish for. The government’s deficit is the private sector’s surplus, and vice versa.

    14. Efficient_Sky5173 on

      Great! Looking forward to buy my iFood, iClothes and my iFlat.

    15. deyterkourjerbs on

      No, he didn’t say that. He tried to explain that sometimes financial turnarounds happen in a very weird way.

      I think he was trying to convey a sense that (1) we are an underperforming giant (2) the Tories were leading us to financial ruin. But in a very cringe way.

      It’s the sort of thing you might say to a bunch of your mates because they’re not going to interpret it as saying that Rachel Reeves was like Steve Jobs. You don’t say it in a BBC interview buddy.

    Leave A Reply