Il molestatore sessuale che si è esposto indecentemente nelle stazioni ferroviarie sette volte viene multata solo £ 1,43 per ogni reato
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14800893/Sex-offender-indecently-exposed-train-stations.html
di ThatchersDirtyTaint
18 commenti
So like the more you do, the cheaper it gets, like how does it work? Lol
* And a one year community order *and* a 5 year Sexual Harm Prevention Order which limits any interactions he has with women and children, and a minimum of 5 years in the registry as that runs in conjunction with the SHPO.
Now whether that is an appropriate sentence is a different question but he wasn’t just fined a couple of quid as the headline suggests.
Despite the fact we know this sort of behavioru is a gateway to far more serious offences, upto and including rape and murder. Top work.
He’s also on the Sex Offender register and has a community order limiting his contact with any unknown females
Not sure why they even bothered with the £10 fine, seems like a weird waste of effort
Whether the fine is £10 or £1m it’s irrelevant to public safety, the key bit is:
>Clarke was also handed a five-year sexual harm prevention order, which means he cannot approach, touch or attempt to communicate with an unknown female in public.
>The order bars him from taking a seat next to or opposite a lone female or child on public transport or at a station, unless there is no alternative seating available.
>His name is now on the sex offender register and Clarke will be required to register with the police until 2030.
How the first two conditions are actually enforced I have no idea…
Should be 5 years’ min hard labor prison, and tagged electronically for life.
“The order bars him from taking a seat next to or opposite a lone female or child on public transport or at a station, unless there is no alternative seating available.”
I wonder to what extent this is enforceable.
Sure our just system might be a complete joke but these figures will be making the next inflation figures look a bit healthier
But god forbid he tweeted something he would have been in trouble then.
Daily Heil, I mean Daily Mail?
Tracks, misleading fucks.
At what point will we enforce almost unfairly harsh punishments for such behaviours in order to discourage any future incidents? We need to punish these people almost as if they were not people (which I’d argue they’re not) so that they think twice before even thinking about it. But of course not right because that would just make a little too much sense innit
Just so people realise, the fine is calculated on the size the penis being exposed, so it’s a pretty fair fine based on eye witness accounts 😂
Why do people bother posting shit from the Daily Mail still? Always sensationalist crap. Can we get it banned already?
Same with the Telegraph, whilst we’re here.
Serial sex offender who the judge believes can’t be trusted to sit near a woman or child is free to be out and about unsupervised.
The U.K. loves signalling that they condone and encourage this behaviour
*Asked for the winning formula of his Daily Mail, Lord Northcliffe replied: ‘I give my readers a daily hate.’*
I may have seen him, he appeared to urinate off Finchley Central Platform and I wondered if he could have found somewhere better.
I wonder what his sentence would have been if he tweeted his intentions before committing the crime?
The judicial system in this country is severely broken if committing a crime receives less punishment than a post in social media.
Just do what you want these days. Don’t worry we don’t have laws.